• Home
  • Tour
  • Examples
  • Plans & Pricing
  • Free Guides
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • |
  • Help
  • Sign In
Create an account

  • Blog Home
  • The Business of Photography
    • Sales & Pricing
    • Marketing
    • Getting Hired
  • Photography Websites
    • Tips & Tools
    • SEO & Analytics
    • Workflow
  • Inspiration
    • Shout-Outs
    • Featured Photos
  • Industry News
    • PhotoShelter News
    • Community News
Home » Uncategorized » Why Bother with a Redesign?

Why Bother with a Redesign?

Posted by: Allen Murabayashi    Posted date: March 14, 2008  |  2 Comments
Tweet

We’ve received a ton of positive feedback about our redesign, and we’re thrilled. But we have also received some comments about the weight of the type face, the shelter logo, the colors, etc, so I wanted to clear up some misconceptions about the purpose and intent of the redesign.

300pxlogo.gif First the design isn’t about the logo. The logo is only a component of the redesign, and while it is the most obvious piece, it by no means represents the total goal. When we started this process with Cinco Design, the first thing they did was sit down and talk to a bunch of different people within our organization to understand what we thought of ourselves and how we are different. They synthesized all of this into a brand position piece. This is vitally important. I like to use Apple as the prototype of the successful brand. Apple isn’t a computer company (proof is that they dropped “Computers” from their legal name), but much more. “Clean,” “progressive,” “cool” are some words that I conjure up thinking about that brand. So the fact that their logo is an apple is irrelevant to the brand. Their industrial design, their ad campaigns, the mystery surrounding new product launches all contribute to defining their brand, and making you want to do business with them.

Cinco then surveyed all of our competitors and looked at how they were positioned and what their brands meant. We believe we’re different from everyone else, so we can’t have a brand and an identity that looks like a competitor.

So the design of the logo and the design of the site are reflective of their research and our feedback.

Let’s talk about the site. Some people said “I like the old site and logo better. It looked more professional.” Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but our goal wasn’t to just change the look and feel, it was to change the way a user interacts with the site. Specifically, we want to call attention to image buyers and have them do activity that would lead them to buy an image.

We tracked clicks on the homepage using what’s known as a “heat map.” Here’s the old site:

PSC-heatmap-old.jpg

People were searching, clicking on some of the “most recently searched,” and clicking some large images. But there were also large swaths of area that weren’t being clicked, which means it’s a waste of space. We also felt that our most important commodity is our community of photographers, and we wanted to showcase the individuals more visibly on the homepage. Lastly, we also wanted photo buyers to interact with us even on days that they weren’t buying, which is one reason we launched our new blog.

Here’s the new heat map with one day of data:


psc-homepage-BLOG.jpg Now people are doing exactly what we want them to do. They’re searching, they are clicking on photographer names and statistics, they are interested in our “manifesto,” and they are traversing around the site to the blog, the personal archive, etc. Mission accomplished. So whether you like the new logo or not, you can’t dispute the efficacy of the new design, at least as far as our goals are concerned.

 

About the author
Allen Murabayashi
Allen is Chairman and co-founder of PhotoShelter. He is a regular contributor to the PhotoShelter blog, and he flosses daily.




2 Comments

Matt 3-18-2008

Very interesting. I would be curious to know whether PSC has different heat maps for browsers vs. known contributors vs. known buyers. I agree that the new interface seems to have a better click-through pattern, but is this based on photographers clicking their own names on the “What’s Fresh”? We certainly are a voyeuristic bunch, but I would think the buyer behavior would be paramount.

Charles 3-20-2008

I follow the logic as regards the overall redesign, but the logo is too blocky and looks awful when used as a watermark on the large-size photos. The old one struck a better balance between image security and viewability.



Comments




Cancel  

banner-bootcamp
  • Popular Posts

    • The 40+ Items Every Photography Assistant Needs Now

      Read more >

    • Video Interview with Forbes' Senior Photo Editor: Killer Portraiture is King

      Read more >

    • Facebook Timeline: 5 New Tools For Your Photo Brand

      Read more >

    • From Photojournalist to Wedding Photographer: Video with Chip Litherland

      Read more >

    • Hey Photographers! Pinterest is Not for You

      Read more >

    • Rant: I Love Photography

      Read more >

    • 7 Tips For Shooting & Selling Nature Stock Photography

      Read more >

    • 13 Digital Point-and-Shoot Cameras Used by the Pros

      Read more >

    • 5 Simple Things You Can Do to Make Your Web Images Pop

      Read more >

    • 10 Secrets to Successful Online Photo Portfolios

      Read more >

The Complete Solution to Show & Sell Photography Online.

  • Choose from 10+ portfolio layouts
  • SEO & social media
  • High resolution file distribution
  • Sell your photography
Sign Up



 

 

Step up to a more powerful photography website!

Try PhotoShelter
  • PhotoShelter
    • Home
    • Tour
    • Examples
    • Plans & Pricing
    • Free Guides
    • Blog
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Affiliate Program
    • Press Room
    • Legal & Privacy
    • Free Webinars
    • Photographer Profiles
  • Contact
    • Help
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Vimeo
    • Scribd

Contact us if you have a question!

T. (212) 206-0808 or send us a message

Our Client Services team is available to help you and answer your questions Monday through Friday from 9am - 6pm EST.


All photographs and illustrations that appear on the site are copyright of their respective owners.
©2005-2011 PhotoShelter, Inc.

PhotoShelter