Home » Uncategorized » Xoxo, Gossip Girl (and 35mm film)

Xoxo, Gossip Girl (and 35mm film)

Posted by: Rachel Hulin Posted date: April 21, 2008 | 5 Comments

I try to avoid to much repetition with showcasing photographers, since there are so many great talents and so little blog time. But I can’t resist showing these Jessica Dimmock behind-the-scenes Gossip Girl pictures from this week’s New York Magazine. Also this serves as a public service announcement, as the new season of Gossip Girl starts tonight. I refuse to be shamed for liking this show, so don’t even try. Three of these pictures were taken with a digital SLR, and one was taken with a film SLR. Can you tell the difference?

Blake Lively getting ready.

Taylor Momsen between scenes.

Taylor Momsen on set.

Ed Westwick and Penn Badgley on set.

Jessica spent two days on set getting these shots, and thoroughly enjoyed herself. It’s a nice progression, I think, for a photographer who has done so much documentary work. She’d like to do more of this type of editorial work in the future. It also “reinvigorated” how she feels about shooting negative. She feels like the digital images just don’t have the same feel. If you haven’t guessed already, the first image is shot on film. So much warmer.

Jess has lots of gossip about behind-the-scenes of GG, but unfortunately it’s largely off the record. I CAN say that Ed Westwick made the best impression. Plus his character wears yellow pants. And he’s a Brit. That I did not know.

About the author

Rachel Hulin

5 Comments

MarcW 4-21-2008

You have got to be pretty darn secure in your masculinity to run around in yellow pants, I tell you what. Even if you’re *gay.* That is a man with self-confidence bordering on the sublime. M

Alex 4-21-2008

The image with 35-mm films more cinematography, is similar to the more “history told by the writer”, digital – is more similar to a news side on the TV.. So was, and so will be..

Darrell Young 4-22-2008

Actually, I find the look of the film image to be quite nasty. Color looks off, not very sharp, shadows all blocked up. Got that just scanned, second generation look. On the other hand, the digital images have better color, are much sharper, have significantly better shadow detail, and look more natural. I left film back in 2002, along with most of the world, and have never looked back. Now, I can clearly remember why!

Ivor 4-23-2008

It’s obvious the first is film, it’s the only one without dirty sensor. look to the RHS 1/3 up in shot 2&4 also the digi is a little too smooth, compared to the negative film, which is a scan of a print by its look.

Pants Are Yellow 8-1-2009

Pants Are Yellow

Which is a better draw for you-the academic potential or t

Comments

Popular Posts
- 13 Digital Point-and-Shoot Cameras Used by the Pros
  Read more >
- Video Interview with Men's Health Magazine's Photo Editor
  Read more >
- 5 Photography Marketing Tips from Kim Kardashian
  Read more >
- 14 Most Dangerous Locations for Photojournalists
  Read more >
- 5 Simple Things You Can Do to Make Your Web Images Pop
  Read more >
- Negotiating with Clients Doesn't Have to Be Scary
  Read more >
- Ami Vitale on Trusting Your Instincts
  Read more >
- In The Bag with Photographer David Burnett
  Read more >
- Top 10 Ways To Piss Off A Photographer
  Read more >