
May 2008 Archives

It takes hard work to be a photographer. Here's one story; what's yours?
"Dropped out of high school aged 16, got my own apartment in Sparks, Nevada, in parking lot behind hourly motel that hookers and crackheads used.
Applied to Parsons School of Design in NYC, but could not raise the funds to go.
Moved to Minneapolis with girlfriend whose lifelong absent mother had resurfaced offering to make amends by sending her to college. Showed portfolio of paintings to Minneapolis College Of Art And Design, only to have portfolio reviewer close it in disgust, saying it was misogynistic. Girlfriend's mother reneged on college offer. Screwed.
Picked up first camera at the age of 22, as research tool to aid paintings: a used Nikon FG with 50mm f1.8 and rubber lens hood. $250. All my money.
Intrigued with the alchemy of photography, began photo education with books. Taught myself Zone System with Ansel Adam's "The Negative" and "The Print". Begged and borrowed time in other photographer's darkrooms to practice technique. Bought Minolta Digital Spot Meter F, brand new, to perfect Zone System. $500. All my money again.
Got job in one-hour mini lab in Saint Paul to teach myself color printing and get discount on film. Saved all my money and bought a darkroom through mail order in NYC. Beseler 23CII with Dual Dichro color head, and supporting trays, timers, easels, etc. $2500. More than my car at the time.
Got job at Ritz Camera to learn different cameras and maintain film discount. Began teaching myself color printing at home. First home studio consisted of a raw basement space, lighting was cheap plastic architect lamps from Target strapped to the ceiling supports. Backdrop was a black army surplus tarp.
Got a job at West Photo, a pro camera store in Minneapolis, to teach myself pro equipment and get a discount on high-end gear and darkroom materials. Took advantage of the "Employees rent free on weekends" policy and took out a studio full of gear each weekend to do test shoots and learn what everything did. Owner, claiming overuse, cancelled benefit. Bought my first "pro" cameras, a Nikon N90s and Mamiya RZ67, used. Bought first studio strobes, an ancient Norman P2000D set.
Got fired from West Photo for absenteeism, lateness, and bad attitude when they tried to make me wear a uniform and name tag.
Began custom printing for photographers in Minneapolis, BW and color. Began assisting. Began shooting model agency portfolios every winter in Miami. Began shooting small local advertising and design jobs in Minneapolis.
Moved to New York. Assisted for "big" photographers. Shot small gigs here and there, mostly editorial. Got my "break" when I was hired as Seventeen Magazine's staff photographer. Never assisted again."
photo and text by Clayton Cubitt.

Lest you are confused by these photo booth portraits of Chris Mottlalini, the dude is not an ax-murderer, or a contemporary of Johnny Cash. Though he does have a lyrical knack for naming his photo projects-- winter city; the mistake by the lake; after you left, they took it apart. In any case, Mottalini has been making some great work. I first came upon his pictures when several of his Buffalo bus-stop shelters (the mistake by the lake) were chose for AP24, and I've since become enthralled with his survey of doomed Paul Rudolph houses, and his recordings of some of the demolitions. I was appalled last week at that New Canaan lady who's thinking about knocking down her Philip Johnson house, and these strike a similar nerve. Mottalini is a great sport and answered all of my questions, including the one about a sandwich.
How did you get started shooting the Paul Rudolph houses (how many are there), and what has the journey of photographing them been like? How did you gain access? Have you been present at any of the demolitions?
I photographed my first Paul Rudolph house at the very end of 2006. I actually happened upon the project pretty much completely by chance; A friend of a friend worked for the Paul Rudolph Foundation and needed some photos of a Rudolph house in Westport, CT, which was about to be demolished. To be honest, I knew very little about Rudolph and Modernist architecture when I first set foot inside of the Westport house. I was instantly hooked and fascinated, though, and I've probably thought about Paul Rudolph and his work every day since.
Rudolph completed over 100 projects in his lifetime, from Texas to Singapore, but the Westport house is my absolute favorite. Even though it no longer exists, my pictures at least serve as a sort of photographic preservation. I was present (and sort of wish that I was not) at the demolition....the street was blocked by the overly aggressive owners and the cops, but I managed to catch a few glimpses of the garage and the front of the house as they were being caved in. A McMansion is currently being built on the site.
Paul Rudolph House, Westport, CT 1972-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Westport, CT 1972-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Westport, CT 1972-2007
Over the past year I photographed thirteen Rudolph projects, including the demolished homes in Westport, CT; Westerly, RI; and Siesta Key, FL. Many were iconic projects and the existence of one of them was unknown even to the Paul Rudolph Foundation. Once I realized that I was obsessed with documenting these houses, I was able to gain access through the Paul Rudolph Foundation (even still, though, I was ejected by cops from the property of the Westport, CT house). The experience of just being able to wander through these amazing, vanished homes all by myself and to have that privilege because I take pictures, was fantastic.
Paul Rudolph House, Siesta Key, FL 1941-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Siesta Key, FL 1941-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Siesta Key, FL 1941-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Westerly, RI 1956-2007
Paul Rudolph House, Westerly, RI 1956-2007
How long will your project continue? What has your experience been with the foundation?
Seriously, the project will probably continue as long as I am taking pictures. Even now, several other Rudolph projects are slated for demolition and, unless some type of preservation-based legislation specific to mid-century homes is put in place, it won't stop and will only get worse. Can't stop the progress, apparently.
Paul Rudolph House, Larchmont, NY
Paul Rudolph House, Larchmont, NY
Paul Rudolph House, Newtown, PA
The Pennsylvania house is the secret, never photographed project the Rudolph Foundation didn't even know about. Apparently, the husband did a lot of the stonework by himself and his wife told me a story about him doing the work on their bedroom, in the dead of winter, while she read the entirety of Anna Karenina aloud from their bed.
Paul Rudolph House, Newtown, PA
Your recent series "mistake by the lake" was featured in AP24. How does Buffalo figure into your work, and why do you think you're attracted to compiling photographs of similar structures? Is architectural history a specific interest of yours?
I completed "The Mistake by the Lake" this winter, and it's my first and only project about my hometown of Buffalo. It's a photographic record of the strange and amazing assortment of school bus stop shelters which dot the greater-Buffalo landscape. Parents build these shelters in order to protect their children from the brutal winters, though I've never actually seen them being utilized. I guess I needed to be away from that area for a while, because over the fifteen years I lived there, I don't think I ever once noticed a single school bus stop shelter. They just blended into the background. It took my living in Colorado, Sweden and finally New York to finally notice them.
I'm really drawn to photo projects based on repetition. I like documenting things to excess. There's something about shooting a ton of similar structures...I like the repetition and the simplicity and I like how it allows for the slight differences in each picture to really become noticeable. The whole project was basically an exercise in repetition, in that I just drove around every day, for months, just looking for bus shelters. Some days I would find ten shelters and some days none.
I've always been interested in architecture and structures but-- until recently, only superficially. This past year, because of my recent projects, I've realized how much I like documenting these houses, buildings and weird shelters. I set out to make portraits of architecture and I really think it's better that I not know as much as I could about architecture and architectural photography. It keeps things a bit more mysterious that way.
You shoot digitally, and in 35 mm format, which is not typical of architectural photography. How does it serve your purpose to be fast and loose with the imagery? It somehow seems fitting, with the danger these houses are in. The images seem more fleeting to me.
I do shoot digital 35mm format (Canon 1DS Mark 111) and I really love it when it comes to architecture and structures. I like using the same format, same camera, even the same lens for every picture I take. I hate tr ipods, I'm not really all that interested in the traditional process, and I love being able to just roam freely around the houses. It feels more adventurous and emotional to me. A little sneaky, too. I'm mostly interested in spontaneity (which is what I feel is missing from most architectural photography) and being able to shoot quickly.
What other projects are you working on?
In keeping with my Scandinavian and architectural fascinations, my next project will be about Leif Erikson's Viking settlement in Newfoundland. It'll be cold there, too, so that's a plus. Otherwise, I've been shooting a bunch of assignments, I'm trying to find a good home for "The Mistake by the Lake" and I'm also putting together a collection of photos I found of Hasidic Jews engaged in recreational activities and basically living it up. They 're really beautiful.
I hear there's a sandwich named after you. Discuss.
That's my legacy you're talking about. I used to work at Red Bamboo (a vegetarian/vegan restaurant) in the West Village. One day the owner was trying to cheat me out of something and I told him that he owed me and that I wanted him to name a sandwich after me. So, "The Mottalini" was born. I didn't design it, or anything, but I did have the pleasure of hearing about fifty people-per-day totally butcher the pronunciation of my last name. Glad I don't work there anymore.
See more Mottalinis (the pictures, not the sandwich) here.
First, low-brow. Knickerpicker. The name sort of says it all. You can choose a lady and tell her what to put on for you. Reminds me a bit of the bunny ranch. But still, helpful if you're in the market for knickers and you want to see what they'd look like on someone hotter than you.

Second, high-brow. This one I found yesterday when I was sorting through Brea's Scarlett portraits. I hadn't known about this magazine, Paste, and it turns out that they use technology through BlueToad that allows you to read and look at the whole magazine online, complete with sound effects for the turned-pages. I imagine this would irritate some people, but I kind of like it.
Check it out.

Here's the question: If you have your pictures taken by an AP photographer, are you still "uncontacted"?
From the Daily Mail:
"These pictures are further evidence that uncontacted tribes really do exist. The world needs to wake up to this, and ensure that their territory is protected in accordance with international law. Otherwise, they will soon be made extinct."
Looks to me like those folks feel contacted. And want to make some contact back.
Seriously, though. This man has developed what seems to be a rather foolproof formula. And the editors at these magazines are psyched.

Client:The Fader
Subject:Ashley Simpson
Client:Jane Magazine

Subject:Steven Malkmus
Client:Tokion Magazine
Subject:Avril Lavigne
Client:Nylon Magazine

Subject:Young Jeezy
Client:The Fader

Subject:Zach Condon/Beruit
Client:New York Magazine
Client:Nylon Magazine
Subject:Lazy Bone/Bone Thugs-N-Harmony
Client:The Fader
Emiliano Granado just send over a portrait he shot for Mass Appeal, with the use of flashlight. I'm fascinated by using a flashlight as a primary light source after seeing that awesome Brea Souders Scarlett image. What kind of industrial-strength flashlights are you all using? Send me your flashlight portraits, I'll try to post them all.
Remember Gary Schneider's flashlight portraits? Loved those.

Dennis, 2000
I know this was a viral video a few years ago, but I can't resist posting it, especially today. And really, does it ever get old?
I was looking through New York Magazine the other day, and stopped short when I came upon this image of Scarlett Johansson. It appeared to be a promo shot for her new album of Tom Waits covers, but how could it be? It's so beautiful! And so different than normal promo shots. I headed to the gutter credit and found Brea Souders' name. Turns out, according to her blog, that Souders has done a number of Johansson portraits; there was also one in French Vogue and one in Paste. But there was primarily (very beautiful) personal work on her site. I hit the email to get the lowdown.
I've seen a number of images of Scarlett that you shot for her upcoming album; how did you get involved with this project?
My involvement with the project was through a personal connection. My friend Dave Sitek produced the record and based on other work he had seen of mine, he thought that I would be the right match to create some of the artwork for it. The record was created in the Louisiana bayou with a small crew of people and it has a curious, intimate sound that Scarlett and the label wanted to translate into the artwork. I was initially asked to create a diorama of the bayou for the cd packaging and that led to my photographing her in a way that worked with the diorama I was creating.



I was hesitant at first to get involved in that way, because I had all of these notions about what it must be like to photograph a celebrity, but it ended up with us spending the day driving around admiring the landscape and picking out places that grabbed us, and photographing mostly in a spontaneous way, without the entourage and stress that I initially feared.
The images in Paste came out of the photo shoot that I did for the record label. Originally, I was only shooting for the cd packaging, but there were a lot of extra photos left over from the shoot that they liked and decided to use some of those for promotion.

from French Vogue
Tell me how you shot the image I fell in love with (the one up top).
That image was shot at night, just using a simple flashlight as the light source. I almost always prefer to use natural light when I can. And if it's shot at night, then I'll use a flashlight because that is the natural way we would look at something in the dark. Most of the images that I shot of her were either photographed at night with a flashlight, or in a forest with light streaming through the treetops, and no other light source. We chased the light a good amount, and she was a good sport.
Do you do a lot of editorial work? I see mostly personal work on your website; how do you balance the two?
Before this project, I wasn't really pursuing editorial work. This came out of the blue and I thought it seemed like a good match for me in terms of my personal interests and photographic style. It turned out to be a really fun, interesting experience and it opened my mind to doing more editorial work in the future. I think it can be really challenging to balance editorial and personal work, when the aesthetic and conceptual demands of editorial clash with your own interests. The worry is that too much cookie-cutter editorial work will negatively influence your personal projects. Of course that's why everyone hopes someone like Kathy Ryan will call and offer an assignment. A director that appreciates a photographer's unique voice and can pair it with an interesting story or subject is a rare gem, and the most inspired work comes out of those pairings. Given the right circumstances, I think editorial jobs can expand your thoughts and even lead to new personal projects. In the end, It all depends on the assignment, but I'd love to pursue more work of this kind.

Eggshells, 2008
Caught, 2008


Assigning Brea Souders to shoot Johansson was a stroke of genius, in my opinion. I actually probably wouldn't have listened to the album had I not liked the imagery. And guess what? I really like it. Check it out. And I like this video, too. Salman Rushdie is in it, hilariously.
And don't forget to look at more of Brea Souders' work.

Delicious Wood-Nymphery!
Today on the blog we're going to be exploring the partnership between photographers and musicians, and our first example is the new video collaboration between Ryan McGinley and Icelandic band Sigur Rós. You can see it here. Beware, there are boobs, ie:

The result is especially fun, because it basically reads as a behind-the-scenes piece on the making of McGinley's work. I am a big fan of the latest McGinley project "I Know Where the Summer Goes"; there are some really beautiful images. I especially like the vertical, falling figures. You can see more here.



McGinley even has installation shots from the show on his site. Love that.
Photo by Jack Delano for the Office of War Information, April 1943.
Okey doke, we all know nothing in life is accomplished without a little elbow grease, so take a look at these calls for entry and do your worst. And make sure to check back to this list as well, especially if you're a photojournalist.
ADC Young Guns

The ADC Young Guns competition, hosted by the Art Directors Club based in New York, has made it their mission to recognize and rally around the brightest young professionals working internationally across a multitude of creative disciplines.
Entries to Young Guns 6 are now open to creative professionals under 30 who are producing work of a high standard and have at least two years of professional experience under their belts.
Fifty winners, as selected by a panel of Young Guns alumni, will have their work showcased in a gallery exhibition in New York later this year, published in a limited edition ADC book and will receive a 1 year membership to the premiere creative collective organization.
The 24th Annual PDN/Nikon Self-Promotion Awards
All Winners in first, second and third will be featured in /PDN/'s October 2008 issue, on PDNonline and at the Awards Ceremony during PDN's PhotoPlus Expo International on October 23 to 25, 2008.
The Grand Prize Winner will receive a Nikon Digital SLR Camera and a portfolio on PhotoServe.com
First Place winners will receive a Nikon camera and a portfolio on PhotoServe.com.
The Camera Club of New York's National Photography Competition
-Each entry to consist of 6 digital images.
-Application fee is $40.00.
-Deadline for receipt of entry is (postmarked) June 30, 2008.
-Chosen artist will receive a one-person exhibition in our gallery and a cash award of $300.00.
-Other finalists will participate in a group show.
The West Prize
The West Prize will be awarded to ten international emerging artists in 2008. The prize will award $100,000 in acquisitions between the finalists and host a finalist TEN exhibition with accompanying publication. A grand prize winner will be chosen from among the finalists to receive a $25,000 cash prize in addition to a West Collection Acquisition.
National Portrait Gallery Competition
The National Portrait Gallery invites artists all over America to investigate the contemporary art of the portrait for the second Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition, to be held in 2009. The competition and resulting exhibition will celebrate excellence and innovation, with a strong focus on the variety of portrait media used by artists today. The National Portrait Gallery welcomes single figures, groups, or self-portraits--from classical drawing and painting or hyperrealistic sculpture to large-scale photography to prints and new media. The competition is named for Virginia Outwin Boochever (1920-2005), a former Portrait Gallery volunteer whose generous gift has endowed this program.
The Pilsner Urquell International Photography Awards
The Pilsner Urquell International Photography Awards seeks photographers for their international photography competition. Winners will be invited to attend the Lucie Awards, presented by Pilsner Urquell, where the grand winner will be announced, earning the coveted Lucie and a cash prize of $10,000 provided by AtEdge.

There's a bunch of new things to apply to, and there will be a bigger listing later today. But first, a mini-interview (miniview?) with William Etundi, Jr., one of the founders of Artists Wanted. From the Call for Entries:
3rd Ward is sponsoring Artists Wanted's latest call for new art. EXPOSURE is a nation-wide open call for photography and a search for photographers of all backgrounds who speak exquisitely in the language of lenses and aperture. The top photographer will have their work presented in a massive scale photo show on buildings in the top New York City art districts: Chelsea, Dumbo and Williamsburg. Their work will also be featured at an opening event at the Leo Kesting Gallery in Manhattan on August 9th and they will receive: $2,008 cash, a full-press promotional campaign and a feature in our upcoming publication, "The Annual". Several other prizes include a $1,000 scholarship, two $500 discretionary grants, as well as features in "The Annual". Visit Artists Wanted for more information.
*DEADLINE: June 17th
Tell me about the Exposure competition. What type of work do you hope to glean from it?
Several members of our staff are photographers so it holds an important place in our hearts. But more importantly, it has an important function in our culture. We communicate more and more through images each day. Images have the power to reach people in ways that words alone cannot. Their impact is subtle and emotional.
We are interested in art that is powerful both in its impact and its reach. We are not interested in one type of photography but in images that exemplify this power. Submissions will be rated on originality, craftsmanship, composition, and ambition.
What made you decide to show the winning images at such a large scale? Will work that performs well large therefore be favored, and how will that same work translate to the Leo Kesting gallery?
Part of what sets Artists Wanted apart from traditional art outlets is we try to present great work in unique ways. With this competition, we want to show one photographer's work in the largest most ambitious way we could think of. Showing the work via massive projections in the three top art neighborhoods will get our winning artist attention from the traditional art world, the press and the many thousands of random people who will happen by. We want to create an over-the-top event that really launches someone's career.
The core goal of Artists Wanted is to find novel ways of helping great talent skip the challenges and road blocks that the traditional art world puts up. With us, it's not about who you know or who you've worked for, it's simply about finding great talent and getting their work seen.
We also understand that there is an existing infrastructure in place in the art world and it is important to us to offer the selected photographers a traditional gallery show. At a gallery, the viewer will have a totally different experience with the work, even if they've already seen it projected. We want to make a big bang and get the best of both worlds.
*note; work won't be shown on billboards, but rather via massive projections. photo-ill is therefore misleading, but necessary for 3pm amusement.
Here's a brilliant moment in commercial photography. Rent one set, swap out the folks.
Here's the question: Is that the same baby?
via Caroline, via Gawker.
Ooh, I love a square Martian landscape! Check out some new Mars pictures over at Wired, beamed fresh from the Surface Stereoscopic Imager employed by the Phoenix Mars Lander.
Yes, It's officially the future.
Wei is a photographer and performance artist who puts himself in gravity-defying poses, often with the use of harnesses. Thirty-seven-year-old Wei intentionally seeks to surprise and shock the viewer:
"The first reaction is astonishment. Some people think they are full of sense of humor. They are curious about how I did this. Sometimes I am in real danger; I have to hang myself high with steel wires and people do get a little worried for me, but I am fine. My work and artistic experience are characterized by a unique specificity and particularity. My artistic language is universal and deals with themes about contemporary politics and society using symbols understood by everyone in every part of the world. I am fascinated by the unstable and dangerous sides of art and I hope my works reflect these aspects."

Life at the High Place 2, 2008
Life at the High Place 1, 2007

Never Say Failure 1, 2007

On the Earth's Surface, 2004

Love at the High Place 1, 2004

25 Levels of Freedom, 2004

I think my favorite of Wei's work may be the mini series Li Wei falls to..., in which Wei finds himself upside down in various contexts. Wei says this series "has led my work to be recognized as the perfect metaphor for the Chinese conquest of the world. In these, my body crashes like a meteorite in different contexts."
So awesome.

Li Wei Falls to Lake Como

Li Wei Falls to the Car

Li Wei Falls to Red Square

Li Wei Falls to the Earth

Li Wei Falls to New York
Li Wei Falls to 2007
There's an interesting piece on Wei here. Also, check out some behind-the-scenes footage!
further.
When we covered the Elinor Carucci photographs of Emily Gould in the Times last week, we had no idea how much buzz the magazine article would create (comments have finally been disabled). Ok, yes we did. But we didn't expect the mainstream media to start casting the movie or for Carucci and Ryan to end up quoted in the Observer. At this rate, the two of them will make it onto IMDB before the year is through. If you ask us, we'd go with Jennifer Connelly to play Carucci. Tough, unswerving, knows who she is. But here's the question: Who would play Kathy Ryan?
Some dialogue:
Carucci:
"I got some direction: 'We want it to be personal. What's her day like? Does she type on the bed? At the desk?' They wanted her clothes, or maybe something that will be more intimate."
Gould:
"I am starting to wish the magazine had chosen to illustrate the piece some other way. Between those rumpled, vaguely cheesecakey photographs of me, the whole sharing-in-order-to-assess-the-risks-of-oversharing paradox and the fact that I implicitly criticized what professional bloggers are doing with their lives, the whole thing is beginning to seem like a perfect storm of Asking for It."
Ryan:
"The photos speak for themselves."
Classy, that Ryan. I'm thinking Meryl Streep. This is almost more fun than the Miley treatment.

Watch and listen to National Geographic photographer David Doubilet introduce the Nudibranch here. I promise it will knock your socks off!
Notable quotes:
"Of all the creatures in the sea, these are the high fashion models."
"Nudibranchs have a marvelous sex life. They are hermaphrodites."
Doubilet built a seamless studio to photograph these Nudibranchs. There's nothing like a soft, seagoing slug!
Nembrotha kubaryana
Cuthona sp.
Chromodoris annae compensate for their tiny size with loud, contrasting hues--warning predators of a toxic snack.
Asteronotus cespitosus

A hard body and thick skin help armor Halgerda batangas against predators.

Chromodoris sp.
Amazing. Though I'm glad my name isn't Flabellina.



It immediately made me think of these images, by Clayton Cubitt.
And those made me think of Tanyth Berkeley's ethereal portraits.


Some images from Issue 1 of Fraction, which features individual photographer projects:

From Biosphere, by Mark Geil

From Action Figure Cutouts, by Lawrence Getubig




So I've been talking a lot about fire imagery lately as a trend, and it's also seeped into my consciousness as something I wanted to work with in my own photography. In fact, I spent last weekend obsessing about a series of different kinds of flowers on fire, as sort of a still-life study, but also as something beautiful and unexpected. And then Steve Cohen sent me the above image. Now I have to rethink my own project, but not before I purchase a print of that flaming bouquet. Or maybe the glowing book, I can't decide.
I visited Steve Cohen's studio a few weeks back, in an attempt to gain a bit more of a foothold on what a still-life photographer's practice is actually like, and how one gets started doing such precise and painstaking work.
Cohen went to RIT in the '80s, which was at the time a very commercial program. Had he not become a photographer, he thinks he would have ended up in product design or some sort of engineering. The draw of the blending of science and art has always intrigued him. He told me he's interested in objects for their volume, shape and texture and how nature informs their design. And indeed, his studio is filled with objects like tree bark and sea sponges that he's explored photographically. A lot of Cohen's work comes from entities like Nordstrom's for whom he shoots handbags and cosmetics, but he approaches every shoot like a story, with a context and subtext.

Cohen was kind enough to answer some of my specific questions about fire, gear, and his recent campaign for Absolut. Here are the answers.
I know you are very controlled in terms of how you shoot, and that you love the precision your job brings. Do you think most photo editors and buyers recognize the nuances of product photography? Who are the folks that really "get it"? And what does "getting it" entail?

The best relationships with photo editors, buyers and creative directors comes from a mutual respect for what we each do best and our willingness to share our points of view and knowledge with each other. Language and semantics are very important as well - verbal and visual - especially when working together for the first time. Often, the beginning of a working relationship is the beginning of a dialogue. Over time a shorthand develops as you become familiar. The people that "get it" are those that speak the language and are enlivened by that dialogue. There is also much to be said for having a sense of humor and an inquisitive nature.

Gear dork-out. What's your typical camera set-up, your computer gear, and how do you print?

The majority of my work is captured digitally with either a Sinar large format or Hasselblad medium format body and a Leaf high resolution capture back. I use Broncolor strobes and Arri hot lights. I use the ubiquitous Apple MacPro and do the printing on an Epson 3800. I am not a total gear freak - I don't need to have the very newest thingy, but I like what works and works well. Grids and plexiglass have become good friends of mine as have redundant hard drives. I don't concern myself obsessively about my tool box - I will walk through a shoot from many approaches in my head and make sure I have what I need on hand.

What drew you to explore fire in your personal work? Fire seems unpredictable, like it would signal a lack of control. Did this interest you, in that you spend so much time controlling your shooting environment for work?



The other, environmental, fire story is about developing a character without using a person in the images. A raging fire in the settings I photographed would certainly be unwelcome and frightening if this were your home. The character I set out to illustrate has a certain amount of control over her ability to start fires but she is not always in control of her gift/curse. She surrounds herself with peaceful soothing colors and is aware of her dilemma and accepts herself for who she is. I wanted to photograph several scenarios where it got out of hand. It also has to do with how life can be going along without a hitch and suddenly there is a metaphoric fire that needs to be put out. A potentially life altering situation that you didn't see coming. Ultimately I see them as more funny than scary. I love pairing incongruity in a witty way. They were photographed with the intention of using them for a promotional vehicle of some sort and will be supported with copy written specifically for the piece.


This one seemed nice enough, but a bit cliche. No shock and awe. High-end vanilla.
I was surprised to see who'd taken the picture. Any guesses? And try not to cheat, it's better that way.
Then I went to his blog, and he has screengrabs of Deer Hunter, which he took for photo inspiration, called "film tear sheets". Which is kind of interesting, because when I was watching Army of Shadows last week, I kept pausing the film and every time it seemed to settle on the most amazing still. Apparently that film was digitally remastered, but it looks like the richest kind of kodachrome.
In any case, some of Blake's Deer Hunter grabs, below. Does anyone else do this? Send.



The New Yorker published a book review of Joseph O'Neill's "Netherland" yesterday, and it was accompanied by one of my favorite images of all time, which has been sitting on my desktop for about a year. I never knew who took it.
It was nice to finally put a name to this one; that name is Chris Steele-Perkins, who is a Magnum photographer. I've since been trolling through images from his books The Pleasure Principle from 1989, and Northern Exposures, from 2007.
They are decidedly weekend-y.
From the The Pleasure Principle:
Hypnotism session at Student Ball, 1989
From Northern Exposures, Photographs of Rural Life:

G.B. ENGLAND, Country Durham. Pheasant shooting, 2003.
See the both series in full here and here.
Have a great weekend, everyone; I'll be back Tuesday with some flaming flowers. I promise to attempt coherence.
The Times has a nice obit. It doesn't get much more iconic than Robert and Cornell Capa. Robert was killed by a landmine in Vietnam in 1954. Some of the Robert Capa imagery that's seared into my brain:
Cornell was protective of his brother's legacy. When the legitimacy of Death of a Republican Volunteer was in question, Cornell tracked down the soldier's information. He continued on after Robert's death as a photographer for Magnum, and in 1974 founded ICP.
Harlem. Savoy Ballroom, 1939
Guatemala, 1953
Buffalo. Robert F. Kennedy campaigning for the Senate, 1964
![]()
Wedding bed, Nürenbuerger Eck, Berlin, 1996
The Other Side and The Ballad of Sexual Dependency consist of hundreds of impassioned photographs taken primarily in the 1970s and '80s, but the shows are updated every time. The Tate show will include pictures taken through 2007.
These images feel like old friends to me now. I like the surprise of a new one. I hadn't seen Wedding Bed. And what could be better than the accompaniment of Patrick Wolf? Lost urban 80's bohemia meets contemporary bedheadded British androgyny.
Listen and look!
David at Grove Street, Boston, 1972

C.Z. and Max on the Beach, Truro, MA, 1976

French Chris at the drive-in, NJ, 1979

The Hug, NYC, 1980
Nan and Brian in Bed, NYC, 1983

Rise and Monty on the lounge chair, NYC, 1988


November 24, 1923. Miss Anita Phipps, director of women's relations for the War Department. National Photo Company Collection.
"Man operating water tricycle" (Supplemented by wind power?) Circa 1913. 5x7 glass negative, George Grantham Bain Collection.
Ansel's nurse reminds me of someone.
Dear Rachel,
Wanted to ask you for help. I recently shot a story on the San Quentin Prison baseball team for [redacted]. It turns out the magazine is closing down and the story isn't going to run there. Pretty sad. Do you know anyone that would be interested? I spoke to [redacted] and they could run it online, but it DESERVES to be printed! The writer got in touch with [redacted], and they passed. I really think the photos are great and the story is amazing. I'd hate to see it go to waste. Do you know anyone?
I'm sending you about 20 contact sheet scans. I really think you'll like them.
Thanks,
Emiliano
....
Dear PEs,
Any interest? Emiliano Granado is a PhotoShelter photographer, a 2008 PDN 30 winner, and an all-around swell guy. Email him to see the San Quentin contact sheets.
Thanks,
Rachel
06-02-97
Fittingly, it was Noah Kalina who sent me the link to Chris Higgins at Mental Floss, who had uncovered what at first seemed to be a mystery; a website with a trove of images documenting a life, with no name attached:
What started for me as an amusing collection of photos -- who takes photos every day for eighteen years? -- ended with a shock. Who was this man? How did his photos end up on the web? I went on a two-day hunt, examined the source code of the website, and tried various Google tricks. Finally my investigation turned up the photographer as Jamie Livingston, and he did indeed take a photo every day for eighteen years, until the day he died, using a Polaroid SX-70 camera. He called the project "Photo of the Day" and presumably planned to collect them at some point -- had he lived. He died on October 25, 1997 -- his 41st birthday.
It turns out Higgins had somehow stumbled upon an unpublished website Livingston's friends Hugh Crawford and Betsy Reid had put together. The website came out the exhibit JAMIE LIVINGSTON. PHOTO OF THE DAY: 1979-1997, 6,697 Polaroids, dated in sequence, that opened in 2007 at the Bertelsmann Campus Center at Bard College (where Livingston started the series, as a student, way back when). The exhibit included photographs of every Polaroid and took up a 7 x 120 foot space.
This story is pretty touching, and has been picked up on a lot of photo blogs, and elsewhere. Only the Blog Knows Brooklyn has full coverage of the story, the author having known Livingston personally:
This photographic diary, began when Jamie was a student at Bard College in
Annandale-on-Hudson. The project continued when he moved to apartments
in New York City including the incredible circus memorabilia-filled
loft on Fulton Street, which he shared with his best friend.
The picture taking continued when he became a much-in-demand cinematographer and editor of music videos back in the early days of MTV. He contributed his talents to the ground-breaking Nike "Revolution" spot and many other commercials, too.
When Jamie Livingston, photographer, filmmaker, circus performer, accordian player, Mets fan, and above all, loyal friend, died on October 25th (his birthday) in 1997 at the age of 41, he left behind hundreds of bereft friends and a collection of 6,000 photographs neatly organized in small suitcases and wooden fruit crates.Apparently the story is even now on Wikipedia. Amazing how polaroids spread. Below, a selection.
03-30-91 (trove of the photographs taken so far)
12-06-93
12-18-96
05-02-97
05-04-97
09-11-97
10-05-97
10-07-97
10-24-97
When I went to read the piece (which will run in the magazine this weekend) I was struck by how Elinor Carucci those images were! Of course, they turned out to be by Elinor Carucci. But really, here is a photographer who delivers editorial imagery that is barely distinguishable from her own work. She and Gould even look alike. This pairing is kind of amazing:


Elinor Carucci, from her series Crisis, 2001
And the others, too, are amazingly similar to Carucci's own work. When I pulled them into Bridge, I had trouble distinguishing them. The intimacy and vulnerability of Carucci's self-portraits cross over well here; Gould was left with panic attacks and crippling self doubt after the public scrutiny she endured.
photograph by Elinor Carucci for The New York Times

Elinor Carucci, from her series Closer, 2000
Text from Carucci's artist statement for her series Crisis:
"It was photography that allowed me to be able to step away, to see what was going on. The fact that Eran let me take those pictures, in the middle of these difficult situations, in a way, reconnected me to him. I was surprised by the fact that I was taking pictures, that I needed so much to make pictures, that I was pushing my own limits, I wanted to do this. I wanted to look at us. I wanted to be able to see the beauty in those painful moments, to create, to feel myself and who I am because everything else felt like total chaos and out of control."
Text from Gould's article, Exposed:
"I started having panic attacks -- breathless bouts of terror that left me feeling queasy, drained and hopeless -- every day. I didn't leave my apartment unless I absolutely had to, and because I had the option of working from home, I rarely had to. But while my actual participation in life shrank down to a bare minimum, I still responded to hundreds of e-mail messages and kept up a stream of instant-messenger conversations while I wrote. Depending on how you looked at it, I either had no life and I barely talked to anyone, or I spoke to thousands of people constantly."

Elinor Carucci, from her series Closer, 2000
Good call, Kathy Ryan. I wonder if Carucci finds it cathartic to photograph another person's pain the same way she photographs her own.
One more example, after the jump.
Holy Cow, this thing is usually $26 bucks on Amazon.

From the Wired review:
Sick of lugging around bulky pro-grade shooters? Olympus has the fix. Its E-420 is one of the smallest (5.1 x 3.6 x 2.1 inches) and lightest (13.4ounces) DSLRs in the world. It also snaps 10-megapixel shots, has a high-contrast LCD viewable in direct sunlight, and features a supersonic wave filter that eradicates dirt particles from the image sensor, leaving most of its rivals in the dust.

photo by Trish Herron
+
photo by Chase Jarvis
=

Sorry, I had Cheetos and Red Bull for Lunch.
In related news, Errol Morris has posted again on his NY Times Blog, ZOOM, about the meaning of the Abu Ghraib pictures, and how to interpret the true emotional content of a photograph. As with the Fenton posts, it's obsessive and thorough and fascinating. Read it here.
Advertising Agency: Unitas/RNL, Santiago, Chile
Creative Director / Art Director / Copywriter: Pancho González
Illustrator / Photographer: Josefina Pro
Published: January 2008
These don't have quite the power of those Chilean storms, but they're not far off. I'm going to set something ablaze soon, I can feel it.
Sarah Pickering was the one who got me started.


PA contest winner Ben Roberts (in his suit) made me think of this image below, from the 2006 Beijing FotoFestival. Photo-eye and Hewlett Packard teamed with Chinese photographers and reviewers to create this event, modeled on Houston's Fotofest. The resulting website is super engaging. Here are some of my favorites. Especially the fire.
Erika Neola !

Ben Roberts !

AND... our runners up:
Geof Teague
Blake Sinclair
Wynn Medinger
Kelly Koehler
Ward Price
Brian Faini
Jeff T Smith
Steve Boyle
Thank you so much for participating! Here is our Pricewaterhouse Cooper moment, for those of you who are interested in such things (read: we took into account who voted for themselves a gajillion times)... from the poll designer. He shall remain nameless and behind the curtain, but don't you doubt for a second that he has an excel sheet and is on to all of you!! bwahahah. Seriously, though. We wanted this to resemble something square and fair.
"Our Shoot the Blog poll was designed to be simple and user-friendly. We decided to implement a simple voting mechanism based on cookies in order to limit the number of votes to one every twelve hours. When tabulating the votes, we noticed some odd patterns. For example, we saw over 1,700 votes come from a single machine in a very limited amount of time from a DSL network. Ultimately, we decided not to count the votes (when there were a boatload of them) that had come from what we suspect was the same machine.
Cheers!
Your friendly system engineer at PhotoShelter."
Again, thank you all for participating, and stay tuned for our next contest. Coming soon to a blog near you.

World Press Photo has posted some very cool multimedia interviews with their award winners. I am especially transfixed by Brent Stirton, whose Mountain Gorilla imagery has been widely lauded this year. Check it out.
Thanks, Paul. I'm sorry I perplex you.
556 West 22nd Street, New York, NY 10011
Silent auction from 6p-9p
Winners announced at 9p
Pack and carry from 9p-10p
All proceeds go to coalition for the homeless/camp homeward bound.
I'm getting pretty into these silent auctions; sometimes you can get a killer deal. The list of artists is long and excellent-- check out the whole shebang after the jump.
For now, I will dream in my head of the images I would like to procure. I have no idea if these are part of the auction, but these artists are, so I'm dreaming away.
Ben Donaldson
David Armstrong, George in the Water, Provincetown, 1977






Senator Obama (above) arrives by plane in San Antonio, on March 3, the day before the Texas Democratic primary.
Medical personnel stabilize Ryan McGeeney's leg after he was pierced by a javelin directly below his right knee at the Utah state high school track championships in Provo, Utah, on Saturday. McGeeney was transported by ambulance to a hospital, where the javelin was removed. He received 13 stitches, but suffered no serious damage to any ligaments or tendons. McGeeney took the photo himself.
Best quote from the story:
"One of the first things that came to my mind was, 'Good thing we brought a second javelin,'" Miles' coach, Richard Vance, said Monday. He said Miles was "in a little bit of shock," but he assured the athlete it was not his fault.
These images are awfully powerful.
Interestingly, New York excerpts an essay to pair with these images from another photojournalist, Bill Eppridge, whose book A Time It Was: Bobby Kennedy in the Sixties, was just released by Abrams.
Take a look, it's a good read.


All images by Harry Benson.
UPDATE: Check out a selection of Bill Eppridge's images in the June issue of Vanity Fair.

If you're not festivaled out, you're going to want to head down to Charlottesville in June, because Look3 seems almost like a photographer's utopian festival dream. From the 12th to the 14th, all of Charlottesville will be taken over by photography; even the trees (Flip Nicklin's undersea whale images will be suspended high in the trees along Charlottesville's outdoor pedestrian mall).
The event centers around three masters of the craft, who will each deliver an Inside The Actor's Studio type lecture, albeit with NPR's Alex Chadwick in lieu of James Lipton. This year:
Mary Ellen Mark, James Nachtwey and Joel-Peter Witkin.

These three folks will also have shows up in Charlottesville. In addition, there will be talks, screenings, books, portfolio reviews-- the works. On the evenings of the 13th and 14th there will be projected shows; one is called Shots, and the other, Works. A partial list of the artists in Shots:
Christoph Bangert
Juliana Beasley
Lucas Foglia
Ed Kashi & Julie Winokur
Erika Larsen
Joseph Sywenkyj
Jonathan Torgovnik

And Works:
Andrea Modica
Marcus Bleasdale
Dan Winters
Simen Johan
Antonin Kratochvil
Balazs Gardi
See the full list here. It's impressive.
Not to mention the workshops, which start earlier in the week.:
"The following classes will be offered June 7-12. Each participating student will receive a Festival Pass for events June 12-14. Housing and meals are not included in the price of tuition. Please see the How To page for links to accommodations, including the special housing option for Workshop participants. Click on the course instructor names below for more info regarding each class."
William Albert Allard - Looking For Pictures: The Puzzle Making of Photography
Eugene Richards - Photographing People (portfolio submission required)
David Alan Harvey - The Photographic Essay (portfolio submission required)
One of the nicest things about a festival in a city of this size is that everyone can get in on the action; Dave Lutz, who's doing marketing for the event, told me people routinely start to hang up their own imagery all over town. This event was started by Nick Nichols, who used to have slideshows in his backyard and invite all his buddies over (not unlike Casey Kelbaugh of Slideluck Potshow). He now runs the event with Jessica Nagle.

Dave spoke to me for half an hour about the festival before he mentioned that he wasn't a photographer, and was doing marketing for the festival on a volunteer basis, just because it's so cool. I think this thing has a great vibe. Check out the website for all the information you could possibly want. It's quite well organized.
Oh yeah- there are portfolio reviews! Don't forget to go to those.



It was a real treat this afternoon to receive an email in my inbox from Robert Capa Gold Medal winner Bruce Haley. He thought I might like to see some ships, since that's been a bit of a theme today. And he was right!
The above images "were all taken along the Caspian Sea in Azerbaijan... they're part of a much larger set of images from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, which I'm currently editing into a book."
See Joerg Colberg's conversation with Haley here.
I think we'll have more ships tomorrow.
1. Say adoring things to Amy Stein (a winner of the book award!)
2. Admire Jessica Dimmock's new G9 (she won the multimedia award!)
3. Embarrass myself in front of Aperture's Lesley Martin
and, two hours later....
4. Sit on Jen Bekman's lap. My crowning achievement, I must admit.



And a few more mentions of work; I really liked the presentation of Lars Tunbjork's work of winter in Sweden. That little boy just killed me, and I liked the image pairings. These were in Kathy Ryan's show.

This is the image I posted about earlier today by Nathalie Czech. It was in Lesley Martin's show, and the scale really worked for it. It was huge, leaning against the wall. Just a sea of flowers. Fabulous.

Michel Campeau's darkroom work in Martin Parr's show was luscious and had just the right amount of a nostalgia/still life mix. I'm gonna buy that book.

The Getty show offered a reading room, with boatloads of photo magazines. I could have spent the whole weekend here.

Foam Magazine did a nice job with their satellite show; it's hard to know how to present a magazine and it's images in a gallery format, and this worked well.

I especially liked Thekla Ehling's diptych.

Martin Parr and Kathy Ryan proved that the 40x50 c-print is alive and well, and Lesley Martin was looser, propping and pinning up work. Tim Barber threw up his entire print collection, but I liked the flea market aspect of it; I found a nice egg and a toaster on fire. And the Tierney Fellowship show killed it; Thomas Bangsted is my new favorite. Check out that goat.
Read some other reviews by Joerg here and here and one by Robert Wright. And I'll do one more post with some goss and a picture of me on Jen Bekman's lap. After that, it's time to talk about Look3. We're taking the photo festival train to Charlottesville, folks!
Simon Berg/ Various Photographs, curated by Tim Barber
Curtis Mann/ The Ubiquitous Image curated by Lesley A. Martin

Roger Ballen, Chisel, curated by Kathy Ryan
Natalie Czech/ The Ubiquitous Image, curated by Lesley A. Martin
Just for the record: while awesome, Roger Ballen's pictures scare the crap out of me.
This is going to be a killer photo project for a scuba-certified photographer.

From Reuters:
After four decades carrying millions of New Yorkers, 44 of the city's subway cars are now home to millions of fish.
The
worn-out cars were dumped on Friday into the Atlantic Ocean, 21 miles
off the Maryland coast, to create an artificial reef, designed to
attract fish for the state's lucrative sport-fishing industry.
"These reefs provide quality habitat for marine life off our coast which benefits not only the environment but also local businesses," said Ocean City Mayor Rick Meehan.
I think this may be a job for Mr. Hetherington (who shot the portraits on this Wired job):


Brandon over at Fujfilm gave me a heads-up this morning about their newly published information about emulsion transfers; looks like they're trying to step into some Polaroid-sized shoes. It is rather impressive that Fuji is responding to the fine artist here. From the press release:
"Fujifilm has always supported the culture of photography and in these changing times that philosophy is unwavering. All of Fujifilm's Instant Films are capable of satisfying both specific technical markets and the fine artist whose unique creativity and perspective relies on the unique characteristics of instant film products. In this special edition of Cable Release you will find the techniques for using FP-100C Instant Film for creative printmaking -- see the instructions for Emulsion Lift and the story on Emulsion Transfer. We trust this information comes at a welcome time."
Check out the full newsletter here.

I had the good fortune to speak yesterday with the lovely Yola Monakhov, who currently has a show entitled Out of Nature at Sasha Wolf Gallery. Monakhov has seen many sides of the photographic coin; she worked as a journalist for years for publications such as Newsweek and The New Yorker and The New York Times, and then decided in 2005 to pursue an MFA degree at Columbia, and switch her focus a bit. Her work is lyrical and thoughtful and is about her investigation of place, time and subjectivity, mapped as image.
This interview also coincides with Flak Photo's WEEKEND series, a curated selection of images that highlights work from new photo essays, book projects and gallery exhibitions. Series photographs are published on Saturdays and shown throughout the weekend; this month showcases Monakhov's photographs.
Here is our Q&A:
Does Russia feel like home to you? What's your homeland identity?
Russia is a part of my identity as a photographer. It's a place where I know how to look. I left when I was seven and grew up in New York. I'm American. I think I style myself as more of a Russian than I actually am-- I just finished teaching Photo I at Columbia and at the end I was saying something about the American education system and the students were surprised that I knew about it. They were like "oh we thought you were Russian." I think I relate to my idea of Russian-ness in the regressive way that emigrants do; the country you're from moves forward, but you're sort of stuck in your notion of what it's about. So I think I have some kind of notion of it that's not what it is; I'm not interested in the Russia that resembles America, like its fast food restaurants and malls. I'm more looking at the Russia that is romantic and maybe even nihilistic, the way that college kids in the States read Dostoevsky. Not as an analysis of the place and a historical condition, but relating more generally to the ideas it presents. So I think of these images as being not so much of Russia but of nature ultimately triumphing over man's desire to make a spot for himself, and man persisting in finding and creating beauty.

For example, I have this picture that depicts snow blown into a room, onto wallpaper that itself depicts and idyllic image of the perfect autumn season with birch trees, which is a trope of a Russian landscape, mingled with another similar trope.
Have you found that same trope in New York?
That's why I have two photographs from New York in the Sasha Wolf show; one is the Polaroid image of the Shipyards Building in Brooklyn that has since been destroyed, and another that is an interior from my apartment. I am looking for it in New York.


What was your initial entre into editorial photography, how did you first get work?
I dropped off a box of prints at Time Out Magazine and an editor there, Nancy Iaocoi, liked them, and gave me work. Then I wanted to do something more newsy and international, and in the meantime my father had moved back to Russia, so I began photographing in Russia in 1999, just after the ruble collapse. That's when I got in touch with The New York Times.
I was in New York at the New York Daily News, (where, incidentally, I got my favorite expression to chide slacking students: "You can't publish excuses, only photographs!") and I kept wanting to do something more photographically exciting. I went to the Middle East in 2000, then to Iran and Afghanistan and Iraq at the beginning of the Iraq War. And in the meantime, I spent a lot of time in Russia and started to see that I was interested in something else that wasn't news.
That's when I bought a large format camera. I still had some more editorial projects, like I went to Belarus for US News and World Report. For a long time, I worked in Russia for The Times, but also did my own work.

Is that when you switched over to a more fine arts format?
When the story broke of the Andijon Massacre it was actually the Spring before I had to start graduate school, in the MFA program in the Fall. I have a Russian passport so I was able to get into Uzbekistan without a visa when no one else was allowed in and was able to report it for The Times. That was very exciting, but also very scary, and that was kind of the last hurrah of photojournalism for me. Then I came back to the United States and started my MFA program.
.
Yola Monakhov for The New York Times, May 2005
Was it a jarring change to suddenly be in a fine art context in graduate school, after being in a war zone?
I had to find my own way, and figure out what my identity was. In the beginning I definitely felt a little weird. The program at Columbia is interdisciplinary, and I didn't have much of a language in contemporary art, but I had a language in modern art and I found I caught on pretty quickly. Still, I felt that this question of "photojournalism vs. art" was part of my identity in an unfortunate way, and I think I only shed it recently. And I'm really glad to have shed it. But you're right, I'd almost forgotten that in the beginning it was quite jarring, though I knew I very much wanted something different.
The conversation was really interesting about art when in the context of the whole group of artists there, and it was more about life and mentorship and the medium of photography with Thomas Roma (who runs the photography program at the school). It was really enriching to go through that, as opposed to what I had when I was doing straight photojournalism, in which there was almost no consciousness about what people are actually doing, no critical thinking or analysis, and where you're so beholden to the industry, and a utilitarian way of thinking. You go and you do your thing and then you do the next thing.
Tell me about the show you have up now at Sasha Wolf, Once Out of Nature
The show is something that's actually still in progress. The photographs were made mostly in Russia, but it's actually not about Russia per se, to me, but about looking at Russia as a metaphor for a type of decay, or relationships and nature and the landscape and memory and longing and certain basic human things-- and home. So I've been photographing there since 1998. The photographs in the show start at the end of 2003, and about half of them were made in December of last year. And they're something I'd look to do a book of, to make a final product that could make it a more enduring experience.

And what are you doing now?
I'm actually photographing uptown Manhattan now, in Sugar Hill. It hasn't yet become corporate. The architectural setting is old and kind of neglected, but the culture that people make is very much their own, and a little haphazard, ramshackle and handmade. And I like that. To see it in Manhattan is fascinating for me.



What's your process for making these images-- are they large format?
Some are large format, some are medium format. I started off with medium, but in New York I have been using entirely large format. And some of the portrait-y photographs are made with strobe, a Lumedyne. My grandmother in Moscow still complains about having to carry heavy buckets from the well on a yoke when she was a little girl, and when I heard that I thought, "oh that's me, it's in my blood to carry heavy stuff."
Who are influences, photographers you're looking at now?
I've been thinking about Walker Evans for a long time, and Atget. And in New York-- Helen Levitt and Thomas Roma. Walker Evans, because of the appreciation for the vernacular expression. And Roe Ethridge, I like a lot. Koudelka, obviously. Harry Callahan; they're mostly sort of high modernists. I don't think I've digested a lot of contemporary work yet.
I got excited earlier this week about the Photosynth Demo; now here the software is in practice, on a site featuring the Hard Rock Cafe's collection of memorabilia. Pretty amazing.

Go there and zoooom in on Lou Reed's handwritten lyrics.

I was struck the other day by Italian Vogue's online multimedia presentation of Steven Meisel's Eva Mendes photographs. But aside from the three dimensional quality and clever overlays, there was something else that caught my eye: Eva Mendes' breasts.
Under glass.
This is a trope I am familiar with from George Pitts' photographs; he is a big fan of the glass-on-breasts trope. I was sure I'd seen this before, and I surveyed some folks, including Clayton Cubitt, who seems to know about such things. We agreed that Helmut Newton and Guy Bourdin were into GOB also. But I couldn't find any hard evidence from Newton; Bourdin, I could. See below.

photo by Steven Meisel

And then I got distracted by Guy Bourdin. I know his work, but I hadn't looked at a large survey of it for a while. Good lord, the man was good. I mean, fashion work that is this witty and beautiful and smart is just hard to come by these days. There's an amazing archive of his work and others as well at madeinphoto.fr.
warning: highly addictive.
Some Bourdin eye candy for Friday:











Want to break out that rangefinder? There's a new Zeiss Lens in town. From Pop Photo's review:
- Lens maker Carl Zeiss has added a compact wide prime to its ZM line of
rangefinder lenses. The C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM weighs 7 ounces and
extends 2.2 inches from the camera body, making it slightly smaller and
lighter than Zeiss's other 35mm ZM optic, the Biogon T* 2/35 ZM. Zeiss
says the Biogon construction minimizes distortion. The new f/2.8 lens
has a minimum focus distance of 2.3 feet and a minimum aperture of
f/22. It is compatible with cameras that have M-bayonet mounts,
including Zeiss Ikon and Leica rangefinders, and takes M 43 x 0.75
filters.
Yum.

I have the one on the bottom right, a la Scalo. Steidl has a new edition available; here's an excert from an excellent write-up at The Online Photographer:
"The new reprint is in some ways more desirable than the virtually unobtainable (and extremely expensive) first French or first American editions, at least as far as content is concerned. Frank journeyed to Göttingen with the 83 original prints, which were carefully re-scanned to create the finest modern tri-tone reproductions. During the process, he reportedly rethought the cropping of all but a small number of the pictures. The new edition also restores the small size of the original book--those accustomed to modern photo books will be surprised at how small this book is--and does away with the page numbers and the odd little triptych Frank had added to some editions as a visual coda. Two pictures are reproduced from different negatives entirely, slight variations of the originals."
Get your copy soon. This thing never goes out of style. It's like the color black, it is.
I can't believe I JUST discovered Dalton Rooney's blog, and I'm hooked. This dude is a triple threat:
1. Beautiful, beautiful imagery:
2. Witty, witty content (Big Polaroid, Little Polaroid):
3. News you can use (Photoshop tutorial, with soothing, Ira Glass-like voice):
swoon.
Then I moved on to more important issues; like the Stephanie Seymour and Jeff Koons collaboration. I want that shirt. Because it has a deer on it, and I love its antlers.
Barbara Kruger was shy too, but Shalom wouldn't take off her pants.



Who won this photo duel? Kevin Trageser (left) or David Black (right)?
Christian Patterson knows, but he's not saying.

by Curtis Mann
I wish the $200 version was not sold out. There's also fire at Humble:

Wall of Fire, Labor Day
by Jason Lazarus
I think someone should start a print trade site. Like Match.com but for artwork. My picture can go for a date on your wall, and yours can have a tequila at my place.
I got a nice reminder of one of my new favorite photographers in the Photo-Eye newsletter yesterday; they're currently featuring Birthe Piontek. I was first introduced to Piontek through Jen Bekman, and have since seen her popping up everywhere. She's good at the portraits and the landscapes, and the little narratives, and her edits are nice. Check out Sub Rosa and Terrain Vague. Also she has a series called Eat More Cookies, of which I highly approve.
All the images below are from Sub Rosa, except for the feet. I had to throw those in. Also, the lady in the first portrait is a dead ringer for Jillian from Project Runway Season 4.

Interesting G9 news from Andrew, our VP of Marketing, just landed in my inbox. As part of PhotoShelter's New York Photo Festival sponsorship:
"Canon is on site at the "Canon Production Studio" set up at 111 Front Street. They've brought 50 G9 cameras and are lending them out to anyone for 2 hour intervals. Upon return, shooters can download the memory card to Aperture stations. Editors will review the pics at 3 pm everyday (top magazine editors), and curate a living gallery exhibit with their top choices. All chosen images will be printed with gigantic Canon printers and will hang in several gallery spaces throughout 111 Front Street. PhotoShelter will be on hand to create free 1 month trial accounts for the PhotoShelter Personal Archive. All images from the event will be uploaded into individual Personal Archive accounts and available to the shooter one week after the event."
Pick me, Jody Quon!
The more things change, the more they stay the same.

photo by Martin Parr
Okey Doke. I've been sweating over here all day trying to figure out how to explain what events are happening and when at the New York Photo Festival, and which happenings seem most awesome. I've settled on modifying the NYPF's own graphic, with pink highlights to indicate things I'm most excited for. I know it's too small to read- click on it and it will open bigger in a new window.
The main exhibitions curated by Lesley Martin, Kathy Ryan, Tim Barber and Martin Parr all are open from 10am to 7pm, May 15-18. Go here to read about them. Go here to read about the Satellite Exhibitions.
Here is a map of the whole area.
As you can see, there are events all day long; these are mostly artists talks. I'm psyched for Roger Ballen and Simon Norfolk. Each day, Aperture will be running the programming from 5-6pm; all of these events seem strong, especially the Kessels and Parr pairing, and The Ptak, Barber and Jen Bekman panel.
The Photo Awards fete will be on Friday night; there will be an after party too! See all the nominees here. Strong crowd.
And, perhaps most exciting of all, is Book Soup: this is a panel about book collecting with some legendery folks, but the BEST PART is afterwards:
"Following the panel discussion, there will be a book signing extravaganza at The powerHouse Arena at 9pm with authors including:
Lili Almog, Roger Ballen, Juliana Beasley, Harry Benson, Kevin Bubriski, Julia Calfee, Vivian Cherry, Livia Corona, Valdir Cruz, Lalla Essaydi, Larry Fink, Brian Finke, Ron Galella, Stephen Gill, Arlene Gottfried, Christopher Griffith, John Gruen, Alice Harris, David Alan Harvey, Henry Horenstein, Ellen Jong, Leora Kahn, Seth Kushner & Anthony LaSala, Christopher LaMarca, WassinkLundgren, Jeff Mermelstein, Slava Mogutin, Rachel Papo, Martin Parr, Nigel Parry, Mark Peterson, Thomas Roma, Steve Schapiro, Joachim Schmid, Jamel Shabazz, The Snorri Bros., Michael Spano, Peter Sutherland, Linda Troeller, Victor Vazquez, Veronique Vial, Nathaniel Welch, and David Yellen."
SO AWESOME. Ok, if you're still confused go to the official site. And be sure to read Andrew Hetherington's running commentary over at foto8. He knows what's up.
Enjoy. Drink Rum; there's a Rum-bamba Saturday. Seriously. And remember: click on this calendar and it will open bigger in a new window.

photo by Alex Tehrani
I know this is a few days old, but now there's a remix, and I'm including my favorite Alex Tehrani picture of Bill O'Reilly to make this a slightly photo-relevant post. For some reason his ranting makes me.... happy.
The Original:
And the Remix:

And I'll never be the same. First there was Shorpy, then there was Astronomy Picture of the Day, now there is FFFFOUND! This one's a little more complicated, and I seem to need to be invited to participate (ie: post and share and such). But I've still managed to troll through quite a bit, and have ferreted out some new photographers who strike my fancy.
FFFFOUND!'s official line is that it's "a web service that not only allows the users to post and share their favorite images found on the web, but also dynamically recommends each user's tastes and interests for an inspirational image-bookmarking experience!!"
Invite me, you inviting folks!
My first major discovery is the French design and photographic duo HELMO, who are seemingly brilliant. They are Thomas Couderc and Clement Vauchez, and they like smoke and sparkly things and animals, which I've really been feeling with the rise of the likes of Hannah Whitaker and Estelle Hanania. It seems that a lot of the work is installation-based, which is a nice melding of mediums.
These three are from colored smoke:
And these are from Noel, which is (excuse the babelfish jargon):
D' project; preparing of the frontage of the Lafayette Galleries, Hausmann Boulevard in Paris, for Christmas 2006. A white cloud - white and translucent discs suspended with wire transparencies - converges towards the Lafayette Galleries and penetrates with l' interior of the store towards its point emblematic, the cupola. L' installation is alive, it scintillates and vibrates with the liking of the light and the wind. With 1:00 of the morning, when the building's extinct, certain elements phosphorescents continue to take care.

Since this is the week of The New York Photo Festival, I thought I'd post some work about New York. There's a really smart show up at the New York Public Library called Eminent Domain that's based on a New York Public Library exhibition of the same title (on view May 2-August 29, 2008, at the Humanities and Social Sciences Library, Fifth Avenue and 42nd Street).
The show presents selections from the work of five New York-based artists who have recently created large photographic projects that take on the theme of the modern city.The artists are Bettina Johae, Thomas Holton, Reiner Leist, Zoe Leonard, and Ethan Levitas.
I'm especially interested in Thomas Holton's work; he's spent several years documenting the life of an immigrant Chinese family, in a project called The Lams of Ludlow Street. I first saw this work in Aperture last year, but this show has a new component, which are the polaroids the kids in the family took while Holton was photographing them. These add a whole new dimension. I asked Holton some questions about the work, and about his upcoming projects.
I'm very interested in the notion you've used with the Lams of Ludlow Project in terms of involving the family's children in the capturing of their own narrative, with the use of polaroid film. How did this change the nature of the project?
The use of the polaroid film evolved on its own as the project went on. The kids always stole the camera from my bag and banged out photos when I wasn't looking. But I saved them all in a drawer and when I entered a particularly frustrating time during the project, I decided to revisit them and to stop shooting my own work for a bit. I was struck how their vision was sometimes so completely different from mine and intrigued by the idea of how we shared experiences together but had different takes on them. While i saw one thing, they saw another. This really expanded the narrative and made the project much more of a collaboration and not just a documentation. I didn't want the project to be all about me. I became so close to them that it just feels natural to include their work too. After all, i was new to them too. I enjoy how my eyes go from my images to theirs, then back to mine. You'll see things in one of my photos that remind you of something you saw in theirs and vice versa.
What is your favorite image in the series that you took and what is your favorite image that the kids took?
One of my favorite images in the one of Shirley watching tv while preparing dinner. She's so intensely lost in the Chinese soap opera while the woman on the tv also seems lost in thought. It's just a moment that we can all relate to, getting stuck in a tv show.
I also love the polaroid of Shirley's bandaged foot; she hurt it on the stairs. While i felt bad for her, it's just something i seemed to overlook photographically. But when the children make a photo of their mother's hurt foot, it becomes so much more sympathetic and caring.
I've always been interested in people who are native New Yorkers, as so many people adopt it as their home base but never truly feel like it is home. What about this city signifies home for you? Is it the people, the culture? Is New York the place you always come back to? I can't imagine what it would feel like to not have a country mouse type of longing. Do you have any of that?
I've lived in New York all my life; I'm a townie, just one of those losers who never leave their hometown! I just feel that I can't live anywhere else. regardless of this fact, I always felt like a visitor in Chinatown even though i have 100% Chinese relatives living there. New York is home to me for many reasons-- the diversity, most of my family is from around here and I love walking down streets that I used to roam around when I was a rebellious teenager looking for fun and trouble in the 1980's. Photographically, there are so many stories here that can be told...you don't need to travel across the planet to make interesting work. You can shoot in a tiny apartment for three years and come up with something interesting. I sometimes imagine living somewhere else but then I visit small towns or other cities and love returning here. Plus i have a deck so I can at least get some sun and air.
How did the show at the Public Library come about?
The photo curator, Stephen Pinson, saw my work in the 2005 Art and Commerce festival for emerging photographers and he contacted me and wanted to see more work. I firmly believe that you have to get your work out there as much as possible and then hope somebody sees it, likes it and makes it even more visible.
How has your relationship with the city changed as you've aged, and what other New York City photographers interest you?
As I've gotten older, I love exploring the city more than I did when I was younger. You appreciate the diversity and the endless creative possibilities. I also love the fact that I still get lost every once in awhile. It reminds me that I live somewhere so completely complex, a place always changing so that even townies can get lost.
I like Bruce Davidson's work (brooklyn gang and subway), Arbus, Winogrand...the masters. There are obviously people making work about NYC now too. Basically I like people who reveal the circus that is this city.
Where and What do you want to photograph next?
I'm finishing up a two year project and just started something very, very new in Chinatown. I've been photographing my mother-in-law for two years (she lives in long island) as she prepares to retire from the same teaching job that she's had for 35 years. Her present life is somewhat of a bittersweet reality, different than what she imagined 35 years ago.

I also just began to photograph at a ballroom dancing joint in Chinatown but have really just started... I've only shot there twice. Most of the dancers are middle-aged immigrant Chinese women but all the instructors are these immigrant Russian dance experts. So it's this wonderful collision of cultures meeting to dance in this random place that can only happen here. I'm definitely curious about the joint, so I'll keep going back at all times of the day. I like the idea of constantly returning to a single place and seeing something new every time. It's what i did with the Lams, my mother-in-law and now possibly this ballroom dancing joint.
PDN's affair last night was swanky and delicious; while I did not locate any cheese, I did manage to

I think Daryl bears a strong resemblance to FBI Regional Bureau Chief Gordon Cole, In voice and spirit.

I used the special B&W film for Andrew, 'cause that's how he rolls. Check out his remembrances from last night; he's got the real dish.
UPDATE:
I had to add the fujifilm from the FUJIFILM BOOTH (byebye polaroid) pdn had set up last night. It was not unlike my high school graduation. There were mandatory props, and a creative director. And the photographer was using a real, live RZ. Ballsy choice. I would shout out the photographer, but he didn't have a card on him. Let that be a lesson.

From left: Erin Stella, Amber Sexton, Nikola Tamindzic, Yours Truly, and Aleksandra Flora-McMillen.
We're all PhotoShelter folks except for Nikola. He crashed.

photo by Joel Barhamand
OK, this New York Photo Festival is expansive and overwhelming to blog about, but I'm going to do my best. I'll try to come up with a map for you guys, or some such thing. But you should definitely check out the Tim Barber-curated exhibition tonight; it's free and open to the public and includes a few hundred of Tim's favorite photographers, from the look of the invite. Word on the street is that you should show up at 7pm for maximum fun. Word.

I have ten rolls of 120 film that need to be developed. I'd also like to have low-res scans made, because that's the easiest way for me to go over the work, and I can make my own contact sheets from the digital files. I'd like to do this without bankrupting myself. There are twelve images on each roll. How much can this possibly cost? I made some calls.
Here are the results, from cheapest to most expensive:
ALKIT
227 East 45th Street
212-674-1515
99 cents per image, for processing and 4.5mb scans, and 4x5 prints
TOTAL: $120.00
Baboo Color
37 West 20th Street
212--727-277
12.99 for a 4.5mb jpeg scan, including processing
TOTAL: $129.90
Hong Color
123 West 20th Street
212-924-2080
$6 for processing, and an additional $10 for a 4.5mb jpeg scan=
$16 a roll
TOTAL: $160.00
Flatiron Lab
108 West 17th Street
212-633-9191
$18 for processing and a 6mb jpeg scan
$20.50 for processing, 4x5 prints and 6mb scans
TOTAL (w/out prints): $180.00
LTI
34 East 30th Street
212-685-6871
$18 for processing and 6mb scans
TOTAL: $180.00
Coloredge CRC
20 west 22nd street
212-633-6000
$6 for processing, and an additional 12.65 for a 4.5mb jpeg scan
= 18.65 a roll
TOTAL: $186.50
US Color Lab
12 Mercer Street
212-254-7200
$19.99 for processing and 4.5mb jpeg scans
TOTAL: $199.99
L&I Color
12 West 17th Street
212-206-7733
$5 for processing, and an additional $15 for a 5mb jpeg scan=
$20 a roll
TOTAL: $200.00
Duggal
29 West 23rd Street
212-941-7000
$7 for processing, and an additional $15 for a 4.5mb jpeg scan
= $22 a roll
TOTAL: $220.00
I think I'm going to go with Hong Color. They're a small operation, and they have personable service. Also, they have a reputation for good quality, and I've had hugely varying results with Baboo. Alkit's my second choice, but 45th Street on the 12th floor is the deal breaker. Anyone else have a better tip?
There's also a fete tonight for the winners at Capitale, and I've got my dancing shoes on, 'cause I'm going! I hope there will be cheese. I'll be sure to report back, like Daryl did for the Infinity Awards.
The winners in the magazine/editorial category include some of my favorites from the year, which feels satisfying. My top five:

Photographer: Nan Goldin
Title: English Beat
Concept: Disaffected Anglo youth at their snappiest.
Publication: T: The New York Times Style Magazine
Director of Photography: Kathy Ryan
Photo Editor: Judith Puckett-Rinella
Creative Director: Janet Froelich
Art Director: David Sebbah (Senior), Chris Martinez
Designer: Elizabeth Spiridakis (Senior)

Photographer: Simon Norfolk
Title: Where Protons Play
Concept: The new supercollider poised to shake up physics.
Publication: The New York Times Magazine
Picture Editor: Kathy Ryan
Photo Editor: Joanna Milter
Art Director: Arem Duplessis
Designer: Cathy Gilmore-Barnes

Photographer: Larry Fink
Title: My Sexual Safari
Concept: Candid images of the New York City nightlife for an article that discusses nonverbal communication between the sexes.
Publication: Men's Health
Director of Photography: Laurie Kratochvil, (Deputy) Brenda Milis
Photo Editor: (Senior) Leah Rudolfo

Photographer: Cass Bird
Title: Warhol's Children
Concept: Thought the era of bohemian superstar was over? Meet artists Ryan McGinley, Dash Snow and Dan Colen, who are doing their outrageous best to prove that downtown lives on.
Publication: New York Magazine
Director of Photography: Jody Quon
Photo Editor: Alex Pollack
Editor: Adam Moss
Design Director: Chris Dixon

Photographer: Nadav Kander
Title: David Lynch I
Concept: A portrait of the artist.
Publication: The New York Times

Chuck Close, Robert Rauschenberg, 1996
"For me art shouldn't be a fixed idea that I have before I start making it. I want it to include all the fragility and doubt that I go through the day with. Sometimes I'll take a walk just to forget whatever good idea I had that day because I like to go into the studio not having any ideas. I want the insecurity of not knowing, like performers feel before a performance. Everything I can remember, and everything I know, I have probably already done, or somebody else has."
Robert Rauschenburg, New York Times, August 27, 2000
Where would we be without the combine?

I spent all weekend trying to remember Kim Keever's name. I remembered his images, but I had no idea where he showed, or how to find him. I kept googling things like "large-format aquarium images", and it finally worked. In any case, I was thinking of Keever last week when I posted the Chilean lightning storms, which reminded me of the Hudson River School painters.
And Keever's images are nothing if not Hudson Rivery; not surprisingly, he started off as a painter. I love the craftiness of this work. I remember being entranced as a kid by swirling food coloring in water, and these feel that way to me. I find some of the images much more striking than others, but the whole idea of these worlds being created in that aquarium makes them all interesting. I found an interview with Keever on the NY Arts Magazine site; excerpts are below. You can see more Keever work at Kinz, Tillou+Feigen.
I used to step out the back door of my house in Virginia and look across a beach and tidal estuary with pine trees and marshes and ocean water spreading out to what seemed like infinity to the other side of an estuary called the Machipongo Shore. I was mesmerized. It was much later that I felt mesmerized by the paintings of Albert Bierstadt, among others. He seemed to capture that feeling of the beauty of nature for its own sake and the limitless quality of looking out across a vast landscape. Since I realized that he was an artist who was certainly not accepted historically into the realm of conceptual art, it was more of a feeling of guilt that kept me from appreciating the work even more. I very much wanted to be part of the higher echelons of the art world and if I went around saying I liked Bierstadt, I would most certainly have been viewed askance since conceptual art has been so overwhelmingly powerful for so long. One dare not go against this idea or be relegated to being called an academic artist.


Turtle Skull Rock
That said, it was more of an accident that the miniature sets I photographed in the water turned out to be more like Hudson River school paintings. But it was certainly a huge break for me as an artist since now I was "painting" model landscapes in an aquarium. Since I was putting paint of different colors in the water it became truer still. The gift in all of this was that here I was making retro-paintings in a conceptual way through photography. I had accidentally managed to combine the past and present in terms of art history. Through photography I was able to realize 19th-century landscape painting combined with 20-21st century conceptual art. Though I admit that this all came about more by accident than design, it has always felt like a great accomplishment to me.
Forest 83c

My early work in the aquarium involved plaster models of mountains arranged into a landscape, the tank filled with water, various gel covered lights and colored liquid paint dispersed into the water to make cloud effects. The back of the tank was covered with translucent Mylar and more lights were shining through this layer to create a sky effect. Recently I have been working with a larger (200 gallon) tank and have constructed a relatively large table in back of the tank. I place various items (including miniature model trees) on the table and in the tank. From the top of the tank in back, I have suspended a large sheet of translucent mylar sloping down towards the back of the table but suspended somewhat above it. Various puffs of cotton are attached to the mylar to look like cloud banks. Lights shine upward from beneath the back side of the table so that I get various lighting effects similar to a sky with the sun low on the horizon. The back surface of the tank is left uncovered so that from the front the view through the water in the tank makes cotton cloud formations and table top items visible. The other elements of water and gel covered lights and paint in the water remain the same.
West 35aa


Less than Strangers
Before I started using a fish tank in my work, I was working with elaborate tabletop models, but it always seemed like something was missing. I couldn't get any kind of atmosphere. This made the first work look like what it was, a photograph of a collection of plaster mountains. I tried enclosing several of the models with clear plastic and started placing lit cigarettes within the space to get some atmosphere. This worked to a certain extent, but it never really had the feel of clouds. The result was more like fog. Another major memory as a child was living so far out in the country there were few modern amenities. My dad would fill a glass with water and add canned milk to it. Beautiful white clouds would disburse in the water and though it didn't taste that good the visual thrill made it go down easier. It eventually dawned on me that an aquarium filled with water and a little paint would give the appearance of a real atmosphere. After all, the landscape we look out upon is mainly influenced by water vapor in terms of the distance to the horizon line. What is water but highly compressed atmosphere?

Palm 57

For context, Photosynth is a collaboration between Microsoft and the University of Washington based on the groundbreaking research of Noah Snavely (UW), Steve Seitz (UW), and Richard Szeliski (Microsoft Research). Go here to read all about it and/or install it.
Gosh, don't you just hate it when you can't get all the members of the wedding party to look at your camera? You're the photographer, after all! Hey! Over here!
Jenna!
Hey, Henry, I'm trying to make a memory for you!
Hmmm, I have this feeling that White House photographer Shealah Craighead, who took the wedding pictures that were released to the press and are Everywhere today, wasn't the primary shooter at Jenna's bash. Because, um, no one's looking at the camera. Except for George up top, who's nothing if not loyal.
And the Bushes released a LOT of these pictures to the press. There's no accounting for photographic sense, I guess. Or political know-how.
Check out a batch at our most reliable source, Us Weekly. Or any other newspaper today.
You may vote once every twelve hours, and voting will be open until next Monday morning. So do your worst. CLICK HERE TO DO THE DEED. Click on the thumbs to make them bigger. Should be fairly self-explanatory.
Good luck!
PA: Robert Badillo/ Photographer: Emiliano Granado















