July 2008 Archives

Check out the Eastman House's photostream, now on flickr.

My favorites are the autochromes.

2678178276_66937c943f_o.jpg
Cowgirl, ca. 1910

FYI:

Photography's earliest practitioners dreamed of finding a method for reproducing the world around them in color. Some nineteenth-century photographers experimented with chemical formulations aimed at producing color images by direct exposure, while others applied paints and powders to the surfaces of monochrome prints. Vigorous experimentation led to several early color processes, some of which were even patented, but the methods were often impractical, cumbersome and unreliable.

After decades of wishing for a practical color process, photographers were thrilled when Auguste and Louis Lumière announced the invention of the autochrome process. The Lumière brothers, inventors of the motion picture camera, presented their invention to the French Academy of Sciences in 1904. The process used a screen of tiny potato starch grains dyed orange-red, green and violet. Dusted onto a glass plate, the dyed grains were covered with a layer of sensitive panchromatic silver bromide emulsion. As light entered the camera, it was filtered by the dyed grains before it reached the emulsion. While the exposure time was very long, the plate could be processed easily by a photographer familiar with standard darkroom procedures. The result was a unique, realistic, positive color image on glass that required no further printing.

George Eastman House has significant holdings of autochromes, including over 3900 examples by amateur photographer Charles Zoller of Rochester, New York. The museum also holds autochromes by Edward Steichen among others.

2678236626_6812eccb9f_o.jpg
Woman in Oriental inspired gown, sitting in wooden throne, 1915

2677415789_c715888027.jpg
Woman posed as Sphinx, ca. 1910

2678232100_73650fd5c5.jpg
Costumed man examining jewelry, ca. 1910

2677415603_1a7c270202.jpg
Genre scene, woman in kitchen peeling vegetables, ca. 1910


2677426065_68110ddeee_o.jpg
Native American Man, ca. 1910

2678177544_6bb8fc56c5.jpg
Dancer wearing Egyptian-look costume with wings reaching to the floor, ca. 1915

2677414299_f6998c42b1_o.jpg
Couple, ca. 1910



I vote for the Sphinx.
| Comments (2)
Alright, guys. Since I'm hanging you out to dry on a restricted diet of blog posts, I'm going to let you in on a little secret. And believe me, I've thought hard about doing this, because it feels like I'm all but giving away Grandma's kugel recipe. You'll never come for the High Holidays again.

But here goes. It's NotCot. It's an aggregator.

Tagline: For your ideas + aesthetics + amusement.

Here are five reasons to love it (and these are just things that showed up there today)... try the randomizer to really blow your mind.



1.  Helpful things, like printable vintage postcards.
2711592571_ac8918d782.jpg

2711594861_519ec4e37c.jpg



2. Beautiful things, like  Alexander Pasevin's work.

index_15.jpg



3. Hilariously amazing things to people like me: The My Little Pony Project.
Picturepony7.png





4. The  I-don't-know-quite-how-I-feel-about-it-but-there's-a-puppy thing.

poobags.jpg




5. Obama things. natch.

obama2.jpg
| Comments (1)
hanginthere.jpg

I'm going to ask you to emulate this brave, brave, kitten and hang in there for the next 48 hours; blogging speed will be rather diminished, as I attempt to take all my belongings from one place and put them into another place.

Madness!

I will be back online just as soon as I find a new neighbor from whom to steal wifi.

In the meantime, I shall feed you packing peanuts instead of the edible kind. Haven't you heard? Styrofoam is all the rage!


See you soon.

| Comments (2)
sub1.jpg

This is hard to explain. Does pretending to be a photographer make you want to buy a car? That seems crazy to me, especially because Subarus are so sensible.

Maybe it's a Canadian thing. I don't understand the Sumo wrestler.

Help?
| Comments (4)

These images are from 1910:

p87-6040.jpg
Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii, View of the Monastery from the Solarium, 1910. Digital color rendering.


p87-8086.jpg
Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii, The Emir of Bukhara, 1911. Digital color rendering.


"The photographs of Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii (1863-1944) offer a vivid portrait of a lost world-- the Russian Empire on the eve of World War I and the coming revolution. His subjects ranged from the medieval churches and monasteries of old Russia, to the railroads and factories of an emerging industrial power, to the daily life and work of Russia's diverse population."


russian-color.jpg


There's technology involved here. Check it out. Feels like the Wizard of Oz.



Thanks, Scott.
| Comments (0)

Find more photos like this on SLIDELUCK POTSHOW

Could we love the folks at Slideluck Potshow more? No, we could not. They are the best and the brightest and they believe in pictures and excitement and foods. Two thumbs WAY UP. If you're anywhere near Brooklyn this Saturday, consider checking out the show.

Here are the official details from the brilliant faces behind the curtain: Alys Kenny and Casey Kelbaugh:

Hot Town!  Summer in the City.

For the first time in New York, Slideluck Potshow will be venturing from isle of Manhattan and into Kings County.  It will also be our first outdoor slideshow potluck in NYC.  We invite you to join us on Saturday, August 2nd, for Slideluck Potshow XII at McCarren Park Pool in Williamsburg, Brooklyn!

For those of you not familiar with this venue, it's a gem of the Moses/LaGuardia era.  It opened in 1936, in the middle of The Great Depression, and was designed to get people's minds off the economy.  Here we are, 72 years later, hoping to do the same.  In the last couple years, the giant pool has lain empty, but has been filled with the sounds of great live music.  This is the last summer before the city converts it back into a swimming pool and they have a fantastic line-up:  Devo, M.I.A, Gogol Bordello, The Black Keys, DJ Shadow, Wilco, and What!?  Slideluck Potshow?  Like any truly historic occasion, it will smell of barbecque.

SLIDELUCK POTSHOW XII
Saturday, August 2nd, 2008
6:30pm Potluck
8:30pm Slideshow
Nearby Afterparty to follow


RSVP

*RSVP Required. You will be asked to log in to our new Network to rsvp.  The event is listed in top left of page.  Check out what we have going in New York and elsewhere, and don't forget to join the NYC group!

This our first venue in New York where capacity is not going to be an issue, so you are welcome to pass this invitation along to others that would enjoy a participation-based event such as this. Membership will not be required at this show, though there will be an area reserved only for Slideluck Potshow Members.

If you have not become a member, we encourage you to do so now and enjoy the benefits!  
Thanks for your time and we hope to catch you poolside.

More info here

McCARREN PARK POOL


Ooh, I'm gonna tie this back to PhotoShelter here. We like to talk about ourselves. Here are some pictures from Marc McAndrews' project, Brothels, which will be shown at Slideluck. So consider this a SNEAK PEEK.


01-1.jpg

mc12.jpg

mc11.jpg

mc02.jpg

mc05.jpg

It seems like everything this week is coming up taxidermied. Strange.


Also: When did clear shoes first arrive on the scene? So iconic.

| Comments (0)
I guess Ben Stiller wasn't kidding when he made a movie about kids sleeping at the Museum of Natural History; they really do that! Boy, am I out of it.

I got several emails yesterday pointing me to natural history museum pictures (all excellent), and I also searched PS's archive; I found myself awfully charmed by Landon Nordeman's Sleepover series.

Children = innocence and wonder, etc. Lovely.


PSC000081190-comp.jpg


PSC000081219-comp.jpg


PSC000081667-comp.jpg


PSC000081707-comp.jpg


PSC000081816-comp.jpg


PSC000082020-comp.jpg


PSC000082130-comp.jpg


PSC000082185-comp.jpg

Nordeman has tons of great work; check it out.

also:

Here is the most charming email I got regarding the AMNH:

hey there, rachel...

i was inspired to email you because of your taxidermy mention recently. i figured you would know the work Bettina Rheims did back when i was a kid, nineteen eighties, and her series "animals' is pretty amazing stuff. i was familiarized to her work through an inspired style assignment i had last year at school. Colorado Mountain College, i am still in my infancy as a wannabe photographer. polaroid type 55 is cool stuff and i wish i could do more of it. here is my feeble attempt at copy-catting. my teacher didn't like the teeth. he wanted them to be sharp. i think i got a b.

anyways, i thought you might enjoy.
cheers

p.s. flyfishing is all the rage.....check it out.

Copi B. Vojta


copi_vojta.jpg
I think the teeth make the picture.
| Comments (0)

Good:

waffleiron3.jpg


Bad:

hello-kitty-rifle.jpg


| Comments (3)
PSC001008103-comp.jpg

Two interviews in one day! Fun!

We just spoke to a photographer who's working on self-promotion; now we'll speak to a photo editor who can help you with your edit.

Stella Kramer is a Pulitzer Prize winning photo editor who has worked for many top industry publications, and one of a few who has gone on to consult and lecture as well. She began her career at Vanity Fair, was a photo editor at Newsweek, and served as Director of Photography at Brill's Content. She has also worked as a freelance photo editor for major publications including The New York Times, People, Entertainment Weekly, Sports Illustrated, and Money. She clearly knows the industry inside and out, and allowed me to ask her a few questions about her experiences.

zip zip:


How did you get started as a photo editor? Was there a particular niche that was most interesting to you, or did you fall into it?

I got started as a photo editor in a sort of roundabout way. I was asked by the temp agency I went to work for whether I wanted to work for companies on Wall St. or for midtown magazines. I chose the latter, having majored in journalism/political science in college. My first gig was in the photo department of Vanity Fair, where I simply kept track of film that came in and sent it back.

From there I went to a promotional department at Time Inc., gathering images for use in TV commercials. After I cut a direct deal with them to get out from under the temp agency, I worked there for about a year. My next gig was PEOPLE magazine, then Sports Illustrated. That's how I started. I really hadn't known that there was such a thing as a photo department, since I didn't come to it from school or from a photo agency. I was lucky, and it proved to be a great fit for me.

I was always most interested in photojournalism, but each job I've had (entertainment, sports, business, etc.) has had its moments. I went wherever I found work. It wasn't until I got to Newsweek that I got a real chance to work with news. We did an incredible cover story called "Murder: A Week In the Death of America" that won several awards.

newsweek cover.jpg
photo by Eugene Richards

That was really thrilling for me.

What's the most rewarding project you've worked on?

Without a doubt, the most rewarding thing I've ever done was the work I did at The New York Times related to 9/11, both the "Portraits of Grief" project I worked on for several months, and the initial editing work I did on the day of the attacks.

ruth fremson.jpg
photo by Ruth Fremson/ The New York Times

It was the first time I felt like a real journalist, and working for such an important and professional publication like The Times was extraordinary. There was so much film that came into the newspaper that day (after all, the attacks were the most photographed event in history) from staff, freelancers, and just people off the street; I cannot remember how much I saw. I can't even really separate events of the first week-- all I remember was long hours, not leaving the building, looking at film, and stumbling home to cry and watch cable news late into the night.

When I was asked to work on getting the photos for the "Portraits of Grief", I didn't realize I was going to be part of something that would become almost a sacred rite for some people.  It was so difficult getting the photographs from family and friends that were of happy times (weddings, births, graduations, etc.), and cropping them down to obituary photos.

POG1.jpg

from "Portraits of Grief"


It became vital to me that I had a photograph to go with every bio, as I wanted people to look into the eyes of those killed, so that the event wouldn't become an incomprehensible statistic. How could you not feel the impact of the event when you saw people who might even have been your own family?  The work took its toll on me emotionally, and I will never forget it.

I also discovered an amazing photographer, Michael Lisnet, who had been shooting the scene at Ground Zero for days and I was able to get The New York Times Week In Review to publish an essay of his work.  I am very proud of that.

Michael-Lisnet.jpg

photos by Michael Lisnet


What is an ideal assignment for you-- how much involvement do you like to have in the development of a story; do you consistently work with the same stable of photographers?


My ideal assignment is one that I help bring into being, from discussing the idea to choosing the photographer, to being at the shoot and collaborating with them, to editing and presenting the photographs to the editors. Having some autonomy to do my job without interference. One great example is a shoot I did with Nathaniel Welch, who photographed Chris Brown for me when I was at PEOPLE. It was a great time all around.

chris-brown.jpg
photo by Nathaniel Welch

Sometimes I've gotten to be there from the initial editorial meeting, sometimes I've jumped in when the story has been turned over to me to visualize. But being able to come up with creative ideas and choose the right photographer is the best part of Photo Editing. That, and the excitement of seeing the images for the first time. Depending on where I was I might use a lot of the same photographers. But the best part of having had a varied career is that I've worked with a wide range of wonderful photographers: from still life shooters to conflict photographers and everyone in between. I couldn't have asked for more.

What does your career consist of now-- are you able to cobble together both consulting/teaching with editing work?

Nowadays I spend more time working with photographers than editing for a publication. And with the way things have gone in publishing I have the better end of the deal. I am involved with creative work, and creative people. I am not just the data entry person, inputting images to show to editors who won't listen to my opinion. Photo editing has changed so much that there is less autonomy than ever, and that's too bad for everyone.

Working in magazines for so many years allows me to explain from the inside out how magazines approach photography. I know how important a strong, tight edit is. And with fewer pages in magazines, there is more need than ever to be able to present a strong project, whether it's for print or for the web. Too often I find photographers unable to focus their essays, choosing the wrong photographs or adding text where it isn't needed in order to explain what their stories are about. I'm hoping to show people how you can tell a story without words, in a complete way that gives the viewer everything they need to know.

I love looking at photography and showing people a different way of looking at their own work. I think there is even more need now for photographers of all levels to open themselves up to other eyes.  And anyway, it's so much fun!

--

Take a look at Kramer's site, portfolio, and upcoming events. Or contact her for a consultation.





| Comments (0)
-3.jpg

I received an introductory email from Dan Saelinger the other day (that's him, above). Turns out he shot the cover of July's Self-Promotion themed PDN, and was using some newly-inspired guerilla tactics to get himself out there; he sent me some promos and said some humorous things. And you know what-- it worked! Saelinger turns out to be an incredibly affable guy, and was kind enough to share some knowledge about his journey through the wilds of this industry we call photo.

Without further ado.... Q&A! GO!


danSaelinger_138.jpg

How did you land the PDN cover, and how did the shoot come together? How did the experience change your approach to self-promotion?

Jeanine Fijol called me for that assignment out of the blue one day. I had never published in PDN before; she found me through one of my promos-- since the shoot was about self-promotion, I guess you could say things came full circle! Jeanine came to me with a pretty specific idea and we were fortunate to have Keren Sachs at Martha Stewart lend us her promos. I was excited to see one of mine among them. It's nice to know your promos don't always end up in the wastebasket! Anyhow, it was really inspiring seeing all these great promos, and it really hit home how special your work needs to be to compete in this industry.


What are you hoping to accomplish with the new promos you made-- what's your target audience?

I have a several-pronged approach to my own promotion. The promos I sent to you are my email promos. Actually clients can even make an instant version of them on my site. When you browse images, there is an option to save an image, and it automatically downloads in a nice little promo-card format. I also send out traditional mailers, normally two to three times a year. In the spring I sent out a mini 5x5 book with 25 images in it. In the next month or so I'll be sending out an accordion-style promo with about 10 images. I prefer sending out a sampling of work as opposed to a single image or spread. Since I shoot a variety of subjects, it allows me to bring it all together in a nice package. I try to keep the mailing reasonably tight, targeting ad agencies and magazines.


danSaelinger_14.jpg

My favorite one you sent me is the bunny money/ antler hair... what's the story of those images-- are they personal work?

The images you mentioned were both shot for clients. The bunnies were shot for Maxim for a story on how to multiply your money. The antlers shaved into the man's head were for Field & Stream for a story on boot camp for hunting. Both were tons of fun to shoot and I think good examples of what can happen when you get the opportunity to really play with the concept of a story.


It looks like, although you do have some advertising clients, that most of your professional work is in the editorial field.

I've been shooting professionally about 3 years, so as I think is the case for most photographers, I'm still cutting my teeth on the editorial, finding my vision and honing my skills. I see myself ideally shooting a combo of the two. Obviously with editorial there is a bit of freedom in the assignments that can make a job more enticing, making up sometimes for the lower rates. Though I've gotten to the point where if the price isn't right or the job just doesn't seem rewarding enough, I'll pass.

danSaelinger_44.jpg
Popular Mechanics/ Inc, 2006/2007

I just remember being younger looking at all these amazing photographs in magazines and thinking, I want my name in here.  I guess it's a little bit the idea of getting recognition, and the thrill of knowing you have an image that hundreds of thousands people are going to engage with.

danSaelinger_30.jpg
Nike, 2007

You seem to have good relationships with many magazines, whom you shoot for repeatedly (I'm seeing Maxim, Men's Journal, Prevention and some others appear again and again in your portfolio)... how do you keep these relationships fresh?

Repeat clients have really been key in my success and sustaining and growing my business, and I feel very fortunate to have such a great clientele. I like to think that I am pleasant to work with on set and give my clients something they are extremely happy with. Keeping it fresh is definitely important, and I do try to approach each new assignment independently from past assignments. I've gotten annual feature packages multiple years in a row and I'll look what we did before and look to push it in another direction, explore something maybe we didn't the year before. I also try to make sure my lighting and style are constantly evolving in new directions.

danSaelinger_107.jpg
Maxim, 2006

danSaelinger_124.jpg
Money Magazine, 2008

Are there specific photo editors you love working with?

Of course I love all the photo editors I work with!

(ed note : touché)

I get so many great assignments from so many amazing photo editors. I definitely want to give a shout out to Amy Berkley at Field & Stream. She gave me my first major editorial assignment and we still work together pretty much every month. Amy strives to keep the art fresh, giving me latitude to be creative, and it's allowed us to collaborate on some pretty great images. I've found the longer you work together and the more comfortable the relationship, the more creative the collaboration becomes.

danSaelinger_16.jpg
Field & Stream, 2007

It's pretty hard for me to distinguish your personal work from your commercial work, which a good sign that a photographer has found his or her niche in the industry. What do you like to shoot best? Still lives, landscapes? It seems like you do a bit more portraiture in your personal work, but it's pretty close, otherwise. Do you agree?

danSaelinger_129.jpg
personal work, 2008

Yeah they do intertwine quite a bit. I think like most photographers, I like to shoot everything. Commercially speaking, still life has definitely been my bread and butter.

danSaelinger_22.jpg
personal work, 2008

I started the portraiture as way to get comfortable with people in front of my lens again; actually, when I was in school, I shot only people and fashion, but when you get out you get pigeon-holed very quickly. I wanted to go back to something I was very excited about when I started out.

The landscape work started off as a way for me to get out of the studio and work solo on my "art." Now I'm showing it in my book; in fact one of my landscapes recently got picked up for a big ad campaign.

danSaelinger_80.jpg
Savannah, Georgia, 2004


Have you had a rep for most of your career-- does that keep you from promoting yourself?


I was very fortunate and very lucky to get a fantastic rep at the beginning of my career. Clare O'Dea (my agent) has been a huge proponent for consistently promoting my work. We have pretty regular conversations and maintain an ongoing advertising plan. I think there is a general belief among photographers that if you have a rep you can sit back and wait for the work to roll in. Where in reality, it's really a matter of combining your efforts so that both rep and photographer are promoting the work.


I LOVE this fish image: tell me how you made it!

danSaelinger_33.jpg


I was shooting something totally different that day - can't even remember what - but it involved water in plastic cups, I think. Anyhow, it just struck me it would be cool to put a goldfish in there. So I ran to a pet store and made it happen. It's just a simple plexi background, no digital tricks, just straightforward, somewhat-still life.


Did your Dad's love of hunting affect your work? I'm seeing a lot of animals, nature, and fishing references in your pictures...


danSaelinger_117.jpg
Field & Stream, 2008

Haha, I guess I do have a lot of that in my work. Truthfully I think it's from shooting so much for Field & Stream, which is appropriate since my dad has been subscribing to it since I can remember.

danSaelinger_53.jpg
Field & Stream/ This Old House, 2006




See more of Saelinger's work here.



| Comments (1)
I can't help myself: Here are three from Hiroshi Sugimoto's Diorama Series:

sugimoto_historyoflife_Earliest_Human_Relatives_72dpi_20cm_(yg).JPG
Earliest Human relatives, 1994

sugimoto_historyoflife_cromagnon_72dpi_20cm_(site).JPG
Cro-Magnon, 1994

sugimoto_historyoflife_Neanderthal_72dpi_20cm.JPG
Neanderthal, 1994


Dioramas

Upon first arriving in New York in 1974, I did the tourist thing. Eventually I visited the Natural History Museum, where I made a curious discovery: the stuffed animals positioned before painted backdrops looked utterly fake, yet by taking a quick peek with one eye closed, all perspective vanished, and suddenly they looked very real. I'd found a way to see the world as a camera does. However fake the subject, once photographed, it's as good as real.

- Hiroshi Sugimoto



There's a wonderfully in-depth interview and behind-the-scenes piece about Sugimoto's work at PBS' Art 21, here.
| Comments (1)
00291072_l.jpg

Holy Diorama!

The American Museum of Natural History has long had a history of teaching through visual means-- their famous dioramas were preceded by slide lectures given by museum founder Albert Bickmore to New York City schoolteachers.

Now, as a part of the new online exhibit, Picturing the Museum: Education and Exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History, an unbelievable archive is available for viewing and download. The images are broken up into four categories: Dioramas, Education, Exhibition, and Exhibition Preparation.
 
This is a deep, deep archive. I've spent hours looking through already.

The Exhibition Preparation Images are my favorite. Here are some highlights:

00291071_l.jpg
Mr. Christensen applies the skin of a roan antelope to the manikin, 1939


00280022_l.jpg
Museum staff cleaning elephant skin, 1933


00283077_l.jpg
African Lion Group in Preparation, 1935


00299481_l.jpg
Mounting Timber Wolf-Burlap, saturated in liquid plaster of paris is used to cover skeleton to form a base or armature on which to model in clay, 1947


002A7133_l.jpgInstallation of Bald Eagle Group, Bird Hall, 1962


00327771_l.jpg
Woman planning exhibit for Biology of Man Hall, 1961

00313374_l.jpg
Mr. Barnum Brown at work on fossil land tortoise (Colossochelys atlas), 1930


phpvDFQZuPM.jpg
Grizzly Bear Attack posed during construction of Grizzly Bear Group, 1941



Some of them even have a sense of humor, which I appreciate.  There's something so strange about taxidermy. I'm simultaneously revolted and fascinated by it.

In any case, see more of the archive here.
| Comments (1)
Oh boy, I upset people with that last post. Let's change gears and see what the Germans eat. And the Americans, and the Japanese.

And how much does it cost? What do people love to eat the most?!

Tell us, Peter Menzel.

germany15.jpg
Germany: The Melander family of Bargteheide

Food expenditure for one week: 375.39 Euros or $500.07
Favorite foods: fried potatoes with onions, bacon and herring, fried noodles with eggs and cheese, pizza, vanilla pudding.


usa11.jpg
USA: The Caven family of California

Food expenditure for one week: $159.18
Favorite foods: beef stew, berry yogurt sundae, clam chowder, ice cream


japan01.jpg
Japan: The Ukita family of Kodaira City

Food expenditure for one week: 37,699 Yen or $317.25
Favorite foods: sashimi, fruit, cake, potato chips


I love that Japanese teenager, clutching her crisps for all she's worth. Also, those Americans look like a picture in my seventh-grade health class text book.

See many more foods and cultures in the extended gallery of this work on Time Online. Some people don't eat very much at all, let alone crisps.



| Comments (2)

14918_3_468.jpg


Deutsch Magazine
would like to raise Vogue its Persians. This is the cover. Click on the jump to see the pics from inside.


Not for the weak.