Comments on: SEO & The Indexation Sawtooth http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/ Daily discussion of photography business issues & photography websites. Marketing and sales tips for smart photographers, plus a dose of inspiration from the PhotoShelter team. Fri, 24 May 2013 14:08:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Rebecca Getsfrid, Vancouver, Washington Commercial Photographer http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/#comment-90126 Rebecca Getsfrid, Vancouver, Washington Commercial Photographer Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:27:20 +0000 http://blog.photoshelter.com/?p=18409#comment-90126 Nevermind sorted it out. Still, thanks for all the SEO research you do. It's a lifesaver! Nevermind sorted it out. Still, thanks for all the SEO research you do. It’s a lifesaver!

]]> By: Rebecca Getsfrid, Vancouver, Washington Commercial Photographer http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/#comment-90086 Rebecca Getsfrid, Vancouver, Washington Commercial Photographer Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:25:11 +0000 http://blog.photoshelter.com/?p=18409#comment-90086 First off, thanks for another great article. Things like this make me immensely happy to be a photoshelter client. But something odd came up when I googled my domain as recommended in the article. The first link was to my index page, which makes sense. But the next 20 or so were some sort of spammy gibberish. Then a few of my pages, then a lot more spammy gibberish. All the spammy gibberish redirected on click to some spammy gibberish site, but was still listed as being part of my domain on the search engine results page. Any thoughts as to what this might be? First off, thanks for another great article. Things like this make me immensely happy to be a photoshelter client.

But something odd came up when I googled my domain as recommended in the article. The first link was to my index page, which makes sense. But the next 20 or so were some sort of spammy gibberish. Then a few of my pages, then a lot more spammy gibberish. All the spammy gibberish redirected on click to some spammy gibberish site, but was still listed as being part of my domain on the search engine results page. Any thoughts as to what this might be?

]]> By: SEO & The Indexation Sawtooth ‹ PhotoShelter Blog | Blog SEO http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/#comment-71353 SEO & The Indexation Sawtooth ‹ PhotoShelter Blog | Blog SEO Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:29:45 +0000 http://blog.photoshelter.com/?p=18409#comment-71353 [...] original post here: SEO & The Indexation Sawtooth ‹ PhotoShelter Blog This entry was posted in Seo, Seo Iso and tagged a-pretty-good, directly-correlated, [...] [...] original post here: SEO & The Indexation Sawtooth ‹ PhotoShelter Blog This entry was posted in Seo, Seo Iso and tagged a-pretty-good, directly-correlated, [...]

]]> By: Per-BKWine http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/#comment-71310 Per-BKWine Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:05:54 +0000 http://blog.photoshelter.com/?p=18409#comment-71310 Just a curious piece of information on the same subject - checked how many pages google has indexed on "my" photoshelter address ([username].photoshelter.com). Google has substantially more pages indexed than what I have images on Photoshelter. Odd. Can't quite figure out why that would be. Just a curious piece of information on the same subject – checked how many pages google has indexed on “my” photoshelter address ([username].photoshelter.com). Google has substantially more pages indexed than what I have images on Photoshelter. Odd. Can’t quite figure out why that would be.

]]> By: Per-BKWine http://blog.photoshelter.com/2012/02/seo-the-indexation-sawtooth/#comment-71308 Per-BKWine Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:38 +0000 http://blog.photoshelter.com/?p=18409#comment-71308 Interesting thoughts. But it's also well known that the reporting from Google is not very reliable. E.g. that the number of backlinks are very inaccurate. I've never understood why they want to have it that way. It would be interesting if there were a tool that you could subscribe to that would give you this kind of info. Anyone knows if there is one? Interesting thoughts. But it’s also well known that the reporting from Google is not very reliable. E.g. that the number of backlinks are very inaccurate. I’ve never understood why they want to have it that way.

It would be interesting if there were a tool that you could subscribe to that would give you this kind of info. Anyone knows if there is one?

]]>