I thought a bit more about what I consider to be a good portrait, and to me, it's a photo that 1) the subject likes and 2) that the audience feels is somehow representative of the subject. Reason 1 probably won't stand up to most people's scrutiny of a good portrait, but since we're talking about portraits of photographers that they would use themselves, I think it is an important criteria.
So the challenge is to get a decent portrait that isn't a self-portrait shot by another photographer that fulfills the aforementioned criteria. Let's take a look.
Fiona Aboud had not one, but many! Here's one shot by Ken Schneiderman.

Photo by Ken Schneiderman
Another by Erin Korff:

Photo by Erin Korff
I love both of those. But I'm a little star struck by the one that Dan Winters shot avec weird flourescent tube in the background. Soooo Dan Winters.

Photo by Dan Winters
Key learning: it helps to be photogenic.
Brian Smith, co-founder of Editorial Photographers, sent me this one taken by his wife. Good contrast -- will definitely reproduce well (I'm talking about the photo. Get your mind out of the gutter). I like it.

Photo by Fazia Ali
I always liked Peter Yang's portrait, although I'm fairly certain that 1) he took it himself, and 2) that is not his real moustache. Let me know if I'm wrong, Peter.

Photo by Peter Yang
Clay Enos was at a workshop that VII was holding in 2005, and managed to get portraits of the attending members.

Photo by Clay Enos
I like it. I thought he captured the personalities of these iconic photojournalists pretty well. Why does Nachtwey (center) always look like a bad ass? Oh yeah, because he is.

























