High Dynamic Range Photos HDR in Photoshop CS3

High Dynamic Range Photos HDR in Photoshop CS3

hdr.jpg

I’ve been hearing about HDR (high dynamic range) photos for a while. For those of you unfamiliar with the term, it’s the process of combining multiple exposures of the same scene into a single photo to create an image with a wider range of properly exposed tone. This is particularly helpful when you have a scene with really bright whites and really dark shadows.

I’m increasingly intrigued with how technology can alter the way we approach the creation of art, and how it makes the formerly impossible, possible. For example, the discovery of “perspective” in art created a huge transformation in painting. As I commented in a previous blog entry, I feel the high-sensitivity, low noise sensors in the most recent crop of sensors has also made a new range of photography feasible.

So here’s my first attempt at HDR photography. I took 9 frames of the same image on my Nikon D3 bracketing the exposure from only exposing the highlights (so that most of the frame was black) to only exposing the shadows (so that most of the frame was blown out). I tried processing them with the “Merge to HDR” command in Photoshop CS3, but unfortunately, my G5 Mac wasn’t liking the huge file sizes and intensive computation. So I had to try it with 3 downsized photos.

Here’s the image exposed for the highlights.
highlight.jpg

And the image exposed for the shadows.
shadow.jpg

A few things of note:
– I processed the “original” version with Nikon Capture NX, which uses the native conversion algorithms. The result? Well, the conversion is pretty darn good. Colors and contrast in particular seem really great to my eye.
– The HDR version is processed with Adobe’s Camera RAW plug-in, which is a reverse-engineered conversion process. Nikon’s RAW format is proprietary, so Adobe has to do a best guess to convert it. I find that saturation usually suffers the most.
– That said, you’ll notice that I was able to control the highlight areas of the HDR version significantly, so that the overall effect is quite nice. I retain good shadow detail, and don’t blow out the highlights that occur when I’m only using a single exposure.

Here’s a single exposure image for comparison. I’ve circled the blown-out areas in red.

original.jpg

I’m sure that an experienced HDR person could do a much better job, and I’ve certainly seen scenes that work more effectively than this (e.g. dramatic clouds, sunsets, etc). But it’s an interesting technique to consider, particularly as a way to give travel imagery a real pop. But like a lot of techniques, I get the feeling that you can get consumed with overprocessing the scene such that the content and composition become subjugated, and suddenly the art is gone.

Next Post:
Previous Post:
This article was written by

Allen Murabayashi is the Chairman and co-founder of PhotoShelter.

There are 5 comments for this article
  1. Josh McCulloch at 1:08 am

    Hey Allen, Looks good! I played around with Merge to HDR in CS3 a bit, but settled on Photomatix Pro from HDRSoft instead, as it has much better tone-mapping capabilities than Photoshop. They make a standalone program, and a PS plugin, and I have been very pleased with the results. I do touch up the final TIF in PS still though. HDR has opened up a new realm in shooting for me too, but like you mentioned, I’m still figuring out the balance between well-exposed, and very “HDR” looking. There is a lot of overdone HDR out there, and I think it does give it a bad name. Cheers, Josh Josh McCulloch Photography

  2. Ryan M at 4:18 pm

    Hi — I actually think that Photoshop is, for many photos, the better HDR creation software. Some photos seem to work better with Photomatix (though only if you turn the tonemapping filters’ strengths down — most people seem to overcook their HDRs by a very large margin), but Photoshop CS2 and up gives the most versatility, as it allows you to play with the curves as you are downsampling from 32 bit to 16 bit. I have a pretty simple tutorial to creating good HDR images in Photoshop CS2 and up at my blog, over at http://backingwinds.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-to-create-professional-hdr-images.html

  3. Mike Rinnan at 11:35 am

    Hi Allen, looks good. I think the use and acceptance of HDR will grow rapidly. Most digital photographers want wider dynamic range but building sensors that cvan handle a couple more stops would mean huge R&D costs – if even doable. In the old days, we would try to tweak the DR with filters while making copies, or sandiwitch slides. Much more versatile these days. In-camera HDR is also on the way. Seems like pentax is about to release a new model which does the HDR on the fly.

  4. mendittophoto at 9:42 pm

    Nice shot, Allen. I am just coming off a self-assignment with fellow photographer, Tony Sweet to create a body of work from Ellis Island almost exclusively in HDR. Some work also part of the PSC. It was a very effective technique for the situation. Thanks for the posting. mendittophoto.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *