The One Thing That Apple Understands is Photography

The One Thing That Apple Understands is Photography

Only a Luddite would still categorize Apple as a computer company. Indeed, the company officially changed its name in 2007 dropping “Computer,” and simply settling for “Apple, Inc.” Still, most people probably think of Apple as the maker of the iPhone and iPad, and to a lesser extent as the company that makes MacBooks and iMacs.

But let me suggest that Apple is the most important camera company today.

shot-on-iphone6

Over a cup of coffee the other day, @jbchan told me, “The one thing that Apple understands is photography.” It took a few seconds to register in my brain, but it suddenly became obvious. The iPhone is a transformative camera in the same way that the Kodak Brownie brought film photography to the masses. The Brownie’s slogan? “You press the button, we do the rest.”  115 years later, consumers still desire the same ease of use.

kodak_ad

Industry consultant Heino Hilbig posits that the contemporary decline in camera sales isn’t a function of a bad economy nor the rise of the smartphone, but rather an element of fun and ease of use that is inherent in a smartphone, and missing from the traditional camera. He suggests that the camera industry could buck the trend by simply creating future cameras that prioritize ease of use over features (e.g. scene modes, dials, multiple storage media types).

Indeed, in considering how the camera of the future will manifest itself, I’m pretty sure the camera of the future isn’t from the past. I don’t agree completely with Hilbig. Yes, it’s true that today’s standalone cameras are generally too complicated to use and filled with menu systems that require the patience of Job. But the iPhone isn’t just about simplicity – Apple enabled an ecosystem that takes photography beyond capture to social sharing. And sharing photos is where joy originates for most people (but not necessarily for most “photographers”).

Which button do you push?

Which button do you push?

Although it took a year after the product launch for Apple to support third party apps, the App Store has become a crucial part of Apple’s success as a camera manufacturer. Android has apps, but the ecosystem simply isn’t as tidy. And given the way phone manufacturers customize builds of Android, the experience simply isn’t as tightly integrated nor fast as the iPhone.

As photography has become increasingly less precious, a second wave of vernacular photography has emerged – an often disposable version that is as much language as it is optical capture. “What are you doing?” is now as likely to be answered with a photo as it is with a text. 

  • In 2014, the iPhone was the 2nd most popular camera brand on Flickr, and the iPhone 5 was the most popular model of camera.
  • Apple has built an entire iPhone advertising campaign around “shot on iPhone” suggesting that photography is the key feature.
  • The latest incarnation of iCloud and the Photos app automatically syncs photos with the cloud eliminating the need to manually ingest and back-up.
  • Photo and photo-sharing apps continue to dominate the Apple app ecosystem as evidenced by the App Store rankings.

In Apple’s world, technical decisions like exposure are handled by the software. Complicated lighting? The iPhone automatically turns on HDR. Don’t like the exposure? Drag your finger to adjust with the WYSIWYG interface. Need to stylize your photo? Do it “in camera” with a plethora of apps from VSCO to Instagram. There’s a filter for that.

In the traditional camera industry, mirrorless shift is impressive. But as Michael Heath points out, it’s probably not going to save the camera industry. The cameras are smaller and stocked with impressive dynamic range, high ISO support and even 4K video. But they still aren’t as easy as the iPhone. At least their batteries tend to last longer.

Photo by Allen Murabayashi

Photo by Allen Murabayashi

Photos and video are the currency of social media. The iPhone prints this currency. There are better smartphone cameras, but not a better ecosystem. And if the rumors are true, the iPhone 6s will continue to trailblaze with a 12MP camera, 4K video, and who knows what other behind-the-scenes improvements to its processing algorithm.

Traditional camera manufacturers can try to evolve, but they are at a distinct disadvantage by not being Internet enabled devices. Imagine if your Nikon or Canon point and shoot could run Instagram and wirelessly connect to the Internet. Would a material percentage of 2014’s 1.5 billion smartphone purchasers choose these dedicated cameras? Very possibly enough to alter the downward growth trajectory.

ps-pro-cta

 

How will Apple continue to dominate the camera space? Sensors and the processing algorithms will undoubtedly continue to improve. But I, for one, would love to see Apple develop a iPhone 7P. The “P” is for photography. Add back 2mm to the device’s profile, which would enable a larger battery, and install an even better camera (bigger lens, bigger sensor) for people who love photography. I would easily pay a $100 premium for the specialized device. I have to think they would sell more of these than the iPhone 6c.

The most important camera company of any era is the one that entices the average consumer to take more photos. Leica might have “invented” the 35mm camera, but their audience was and is niche. The digital camera might have been an unavoidable technological shift, but the real explosion in the number of photos taken is almost certainly attributable to the iPhone and the apps that it supports.

I don’t know how Apple will fare with TVs and autonomous cars, but I know the one thing that Apple understands is photography.


A previous version of this article erroneously indicated that the App Store launched two years after the iPhone launch. h/t @rizzledizzle

Next Post:
Previous Post:
This article was written by

Allen Murabayashi is the Chairman and co-founder of PhotoShelter. He co-hosts the "I Love Photography" podcast on iTunes.

There are 10 comments for this article
  1. Mark J. Smith at 7:03 pm

    If they know so much about photography why did the kill Aperture.
    I’ll tell you.
    Their interest in photography is all about the masses taking snapshots….sorry, that isn’t photography. Nothing wrong with it but please, get real. There are certainly different levels of photography but I don’t think their efforts qualify as understanding photography.
    Mark

    • Allen Murabayashi Author at 10:17 am

      They killed Aperture because Lightroom gobbled their marketshare and it was no longer profitable for them. Apple produces Logic for music and Final Cut for movies. These are both pro tools. It doesn’t makes sense to me that they are motivated solely by dumbed down products.

  2. G at 9:37 pm

    Huh? The galaxy crushes the iPhone camera in every way, what are you talking about? It is already better than the yet to be introduced iPhone 7!

  3. MIke at 11:15 pm

    You writers must do your homework and not sound so ignorant. It hasn’t been until recent models that the iPhone shoots good pictures. Of course its the most popular camera in many social media sites as the phone itself is very popular. That in now way means its a great camera shooter. I’ll leave it at this its funny how my other half has been an avid iPhone user yet every time she wants a good picture she is like use your Nokia phone.

    • Allen Murabayashi Author at 10:18 am

      The point isn’t that the camera is superior. It’s that the act of taking then consuming the photo is superior. This is what makes photography popular.

  4. Andre at 12:11 pm

    I disagree with it. If you really understand and love photography you will never discontinue professional softwares like Aperture.

  5. Aboud at 8:53 pm

    Interesting article and I think as a technology company Apple does get photography – for snap shooters, but, despite their slick commercials, not for working pros or serious enthusiasts. I cannot accept the premise that Apple is the most important camera company today, nothing in the hardware is particularly innovative, except for the cloud aspect, it has all been done before and while the camera functions are just fine, Canon, Sony and Nikon produce cameras capable of up to 50 and 37 megapixels on a 24X36MM sensor. To paraphrase M.C. Hammer The Apple 8 MP sensor 1/3″ sensor can’t touch this. Canon and Nikon, along with many other camera companies, produce a myriad of lenses capable of tilt and shift movements, twice life-size macro images, high speed prime lenses and outrageous wide angle zoom ranges with virtually no distortion like the recently released Canon 11-24MM. Photo apps for iPhone can accomplish a lot of fun things for snap shooters with algorithms, imitating creativity, but they cannot compete with the results possible with real cameras and dedicated software like Lightroom and Photoshop in the hands of a talented photographer. As the ad says, only an iPhone is an iPhone. A phone with a lot of capabilities, but still a phone.

  6. Louis at 12:27 am

    I have been on Android for about two years and will definitely be switching back with the release of the iPhone 6s. Better image control and faster auto focus as well as a better app ecosystem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *