Google Images Now Displays Copyright Info

Google Images Now Displays Copyright Info

Protecting images from online theft is a major concern for many photographers. Images can be stolen, misappropriated, weaponized, and more. And while much of this activity is spawned by bad actors, many legitimate image licensees are thwarted because they can’t find information about an image creator or copyright holder. “Orphaning” occurs, in part, because many online services strip metadata (e.g. Facebook) or simply fail to read the embedded IPTC metadata.

Part of the logic for stripping or ignoring is practical. Metadata can easily exceed the size of a rescaled image, and because page load times are so crucial to audience retention, online services try to slim down images as much as possible by stripping metadata and serving up more efficient image formats like WebP.

Ingesting an image to read its metadata is also compute-intensive (at least relative to not ingesting it at all). Imagine inviting 100 people to a party, and having them all respond via Microsoft Word instead of by email or an invite service. You’d have to open each document just to read “yes” or “no.” In the past, I’ve argued that Google would never do this because they have no economic incentive to provide this information to their users.

Thankfully things have changed.

In late September 2018, Google announced that it had been working with two photo industry consortiums, CEPIC and IPTC, to integrate some image ownership-related metadata into search results.

Here’s how it works.

Images containing IPTC Creator, Credit, or Copyright info (all IPTC info is easily added using virtually any image editor from Photoshop to Apple Preview) will now offer an “Image Credit” link when viewing Google Images search results. Clicking the link will reveal a pop-up window containing the associated metadata.

Google images desktop view has a new “Image credits” link below the image when IPTC Creator, Credit and/or Copyright exist. 

Clicking on the link reveals a pop-up window which displays embedded IPTC metadata.

On mobile, click the vertical ellipsis that appears on the right below the image, select “Image credits” and a pop-up window displays embedded IPTC metadata.

Previously, PhotoShelter only included IPTC Copyright in screen resolution images (your full res and client-download images contained the full IPTC info). But with Google’s update, we’re also including IPTC Creator and Credit. Google has already begun to extract this data, so there’s nothing you need to do. Those images will show up with this additional information.

Image editors like Adobe Lightroom allow editing of IPTC metadata.

The inclusion of the ownership info behind the “Image Credit” link isn’t ideal. Professional photographers could legitimately argue that this information should be presented without having to click a link, but it’s worth noting that search engines service huge swaths of users, and therefore, what may seem obvious to a professional photographer is useless to another demographic.

But displaying the info and linking to an image that has the embedded metadata makes it more difficult for image thieves to claim they weren’t aware of the copyright. Willfully stripping metadata and/or a copyright notice from an image violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which can lead to penalties of between $2,500 and $25,000 plus attorney fees.

Google captures about 92% of global searches, so its decision to include creator information isn’t trivial by any means. At the very least, it’s an acknowledgment of the intellectual property rights of the creative class, and represents a significant starting point for future development.

Next Post:
Previous Post:
This article was written by

Allen Murabayashi is the Chairman and co-founder of PhotoShelter.

There are 5 comments for this article
  1. Tod Grubbs at 12:39 pm

    It is about time google stopped enabling the theft of images. The other change that was not mentioned is google changed google images image ranking and now images are ranked by not just content, alt tag and name but page rank / domain rank causing a lot of our images to not be listed on the first page any more due to page / domain rank. Now the big stock image agencies show up before many of us smaller photogs struggling to be seen.

  2. Ian Arthur at 10:31 am

    And about time, too…! But not in the UK yet, sad to say. I know of several photographers – professional – who overlook their metadata. To me it’s always crucial to fill in those damn annoying boxes in the file info. It’s a pain, it’s annoying, it can take a little extra time, but it’s worth it for things like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *